通过故意制造摩擦，让AI输出变半成品，激发设计师主动参与。
Drag or Traction: Understanding How Designers Appropriate Friction in AI Ideation Outputs
- 在AI输出中引入断裂、延迟、模糊等故意干扰，使其从成品变为可改造的半成品。
- 设计师会从破碎文本中提取关键词，利用延迟思考，把隐喻当创意谜题破解。
- 用户对摩擦的接受度差异大，高接受者视其为启发，低接受者视为阻碍。
无缝的AI输出常以成品形式呈现，导致用户产生设计固化——过度依赖AI建议而抑制自主创想。本文提出「生成性摩擦」机制，通过有意引入断裂、延迟、模糊等干扰，将AI输出转化为半成品，鼓励用户主动参与而非被动接受。六位设计师的定性研究发现：用户会从破碎文本中挖掘关键词，利用延迟作为独立思考的空间，将隐喻视为创意解谜。但这种转化并非普遍有效，由此引出「摩擦倾向」概念——即用户将阻力解读为邀请而非障碍的潜在心理特质。该特质受模糊容忍度和既有工作流程影响，高倾向用户视摩擦为解放，低倾向用户则感到拖累。本研究区分了生成性摩擦与保护性摩擦，为对抗设计固化、保持用户主体性的AI工具设计提供新思路。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Seamless AI presents output as a finished, polished product that users consume rather than shape. This risks design fixation: users anchor on AI suggestions rather than generating their own ideas. We propose Generative Friction, which introduces intentional disruptions to AI output (fragmentation, delay, ambiguity) designed to transform it from finished product into semi-finished material, inviting human contribution rather than passive acceptance. In a qualitative study with six designers, we identified the different ways in which designers appropriated the different types of friction: users mined keywords from broken text, used delays as workspace for independent thought, and solved metaphors as creative puzzles. However, this transformation was not universal, motivating the concept of Friction Disposition, a user's propensity to interpret resistance as invitation rather than obstruction. Grounded in tolerance for ambiguity and pre-existing workflow orientation, Friction Disposition emerged as a potential moderator: high-disposition users treated friction as "liberating," while low-disposition users experienced drag. We contribute the concept of Generative Friction as distinct from Protective Friction, with design implications for AI tools that counter fixation while preserving agency.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。