arXiv:2603.28013cs.CRcs.AI2026-03被引 4

通过追踪攻击链四阶段,揭示大模型系统在不同环节的注入漏洞。

Kill-Chain Canaries: Stage-Level Tracking of Prompt Injection Across Attack Surfaces and Model Safety Tiers

  • 设计攻击链监控框架,追踪令牌从暴露到执行的四个阶段。
  • 发现写入节点位置是最高杠杆安全决策,可阻断传播路径。
  • 白底黑字文档攻击效果与可见文本相当,渲染层检测无效。

多智能体大模型系统正进入生产环境,处理文档、管理流程、代用户行动,但其对提示注入的韧性仍仅以成功与否二元判断,缺乏诊断信息。本文提出杀伤链蜜罐方法,追踪加密令牌在950次实验、五款前沿大模型、六类攻击面和五种防御条件下的四个阶段(暴露→留存→传递→执行)。结果将提示注入重定义为系统架构问题:所有模型均完全暴露,但下游结果分化显著——Claude在内存写入阶段阻断所有注入(ASR=0/164),GPT-4o-mini传播率达53%,DeepSeek在相同模型下各攻击面表现差异达0%/100%。三个部署关键发现:(1) 写入节点位置是最高杠杆安全决策——通过可信模型路由写入可彻底阻断传播;(2) 所有四种防御在至少一个攻击面上失效,仅因通道错配,无需对抗适应;(3) 无形白底黑字PDF载荷的攻击成功率与可见文本相当或更高,说明渲染层筛查不足。这些动态直接适用于生产场景:机构投资者与金融机构已将自然语言处理流水线用于财报电话会、美国证监会文件及分析师报告——如今正迁移至大模型代理工作流。代码、运行日志与工具已公开。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Multi-agent LLM systems are entering production -- processing documents, managing workflows, acting on behalf of users -- yet their resilience to prompt injection is still evaluated with a single binary: did the attack succeed? This leaves architects without the diagnostic information needed to harden real pipelines. We introduce a kill-chain canary methodology that tracks a cryptographic token through four stages (EXPOSED -> PERSISTED -> RELAYED -> EXECUTED) across 950 runs, five frontier LLMs, six attack surfaces, and five defense conditions. The results reframe prompt injection as a pipeline-architecture problem: every model is fully exposed, yet outcomes diverge downstream -- Claude blocks all injections at memory-write (0/164 ASR), GPT-4o-mini propagates at 53%, and DeepSeek exhibits 0%/100% across surfaces from the same model. Three findings matter for deployment: (1) write-node placement is the highest-leverage safety decision -- routing writes through a verified model eliminates propagation; (2) all four defenses fail on at least one surface due to channel mismatch alone, no adversarial adaptation required; (3) invisible whitefont PDF payloads match or exceed visible-text ASR, meaning rendered-layer screening is insufficient. These dynamics apply directly to production: institutional investors and financial firms already run NLP pipelines over earnings calls, SEC filings, and analyst reports -- the document-ingestion workflows now migrating to LLM agents. Code, run logs, and tooling are publicly released.

提示注入安全评估多智能体防御机制

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。