arXiv:2604.01725cs.AIcs.LG2026-04

轻量可解释框架提升通用航空故障诊断效率与可靠性

LiteInception: A Lightweight and Interpretable Deep Learning Framework for General Aviation Fault Diagnosis

  • 分两阶段设计,先高召回检测后精细分类,灵活分配算力
  • 模型压缩后推理速度提升8倍以上,准确率损失不足3%
  • 支持多种诊断场景自适应,提供传感器-时间维度的可解释证据链

通用航空故障诊断与高效维护对飞行安全至关重要;然而,在资源受限的边缘设备上部署深度学习模型面临计算能力与可解释性的双重挑战。本文提出LiteInception——一个专为边缘部署设计的轻量级可解释故障诊断框架。该框架采用与标准维护流程对齐的两级级联架构:第一阶段实现高召回故障检测,第二阶段对异常样本进行细粒度故障分类,从而解耦优化目标,支持按需分配计算资源。在模型压缩方面,提出基于互信息、梯度分析与SE注意力权重的多方法融合策略,将输入传感器通道数从23降至15;引入1+1分支轻量级Inception结构,使InceptionTime参数量减少70%,CPU推理加速超过8倍,F1分数损失小于3%。此外,引入知识蒸馏作为精度-召回调节机制,使同一轻量模型可通过切换训练策略适应安全关键与辅助诊断等不同场景。最后构建双层可解释性框架,集成四种归因方法,提供‘哪个传感器、哪个时间段’的可追溯证据链。在NGAFID数据集上的实验表明,故障检测准确率为81.92%,召回率达83.24%,故障识别准确率为77.00%,验证了该框架在效率、准确率与可解释性之间的良好平衡。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

General aviation fault diagnosis and efficient maintenance are critical to flight safety; however, deploying deep learning models on resource-constrained edge devices poses dual challenges in computational capacity and interpretability. This paper proposes LiteInception--a lightweight interpretable fault diagnosis framework designed for edge deployment. The framework adopts a two-stage cascaded architecture aligned with standard maintenance workflows: Stage 1 performs high-recall fault detection, and Stage 2 conducts fine-grained fault classification on anomalous samples, thereby decoupling optimization objectives and enabling on-demand allocation of computational resources. For model compression, a multi-method fusion strategy based on mutual information, gradient analysis, and SE attention weights is proposed to reduce the input sensor channels from 23 to 15, and a 1+1 branch LiteInception architecture is introduced that compresses InceptionTime parameters by 70%, accelerates CPU inference by over 8x, with less than 3% F1 loss. Furthermore, knowledge distillation is introduced as a precision-recall regulation mechanism, enabling the same lightweight model to adapt to different scenarios--such as safety-critical and auxiliary diagnosis--by switching training strategies. Finally, a dual-layer interpretability framework integrating four attribution methods is constructed, providing traceable evidence chains of "which sensor x which time period." Experiments on the NGAFID dataset demonstrate a fault detection accuracy of 81.92% with 83.24% recall, and a fault identification accuracy of 77.00%, validating the framework's favorable balance among efficiency, accuracy, and interpretability.

故障诊断轻量模型可解释性边缘计算

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。