arXiv:2604.02486cs.CVcs.CL2026-04中稿 · COLM被引 8

视觉语言模型依赖语义标签,忽略细节,命名越明确表现越好。

VLMs Need Words: Vision Language Models Ignore Visual Detail In Favor of Semantic Anchors

  • 模型遇到有名称的视觉元素时跳过细节比对,直接用语言推理。
  • 无名物体识别任务中性能下降60%以上,命名后准确率显著提升。
  • 通过命名新概念或任务微调,可突破语言依赖,实现真实视觉感知。

视觉语言模型在多模态任务中表现优异,但在需要细粒度视觉感知的任务上仍会失败,即使所需信息存在于其内部表征中。以往研究归因于语言模型缺陷,但原因未明。本文证明该问题源于语言模型缺乏对细粒度视觉细节的语义标签:当视觉实体可映射到已知概念时,模型跳过视觉比对,仅通过语言推理;当无法命名时,模型生成脆弱且虚构的描述。我们在语义对应、合成形状匹配和人脸匹配任务中验证此现象,发现命名可识别的实体时模型表现远优于不可命名者。对Logit Lens分析显示,命名实体能被显式恢复,产生更多独特标记。进一步实验表明,为未知实体赋予任意名称即可提升性能;更重要的是,通过任务特定微调,模型能在不依赖语言先验的情况下实现更强泛化,即通过真实视觉感知。结果表明,当前VLM在视觉任务上的失败是学习到的捷径,而非多模态推理的根本局限。代码与数据集见https://github.com/Patchwork53/VLMs-Need-Words-COLM2026。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a wide range of multimodal tasks. However, they often fail on tasks that require fine-grained visual perception, even when the required information is still present in their internal representations. Prior work has attributed this ``hidden-in-plain-sight'' gap to the language model, but the cause remains unexplained. In this work, we demonstrate that this gap arises from the language model's lack of semantic labels for fine-grained visual details: when visual entities can be mapped to known concepts, VLMs bypass visual comparison and reason through language; when they cannot, VLMs resort to brittle and hallucinated descriptions. We verify this across semantic correspondence, synthetic shape matching, and face matching, and find that VLMs perform much better when the relevant entities are nameable than when they are unnamable. Mechanistically, Logit Lens analysis confirms that VLMs explicitly recover semantic labels for nameable entities and surface more unique tokens compared to unnameable entities. Furthermore, we show that this limitation can be addressed: teaching completely arbitrary names for unknown entities improves performance. More importantly, task-specific finetuning yields even stronger generalization without relying on language priors, i.e., through real visual perception. Our findings suggest that current VLM failures on visual tasks reflect a learned shortcut rather than a fundamental limitation of multimodal reasoning. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/Patchwork53/VLMs-Need-Words-COLM2026.

视觉语言模型细粒度感知语言依赖微调

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。