用稀疏自编码器修复图神经网络的相位漂移问题
Sparse Autoencoders as a Steering Basis for Phase Synchronization in Graph-Based CFD Surrogates

- 用稀疏自编码器解耦隐空间,提取可操控的振荡特征
- 通过时序一致的旋转调整周期模式,恢复时间对齐精度
- 适合数字孪生与闭环控制场景,无需重新训练模型
基于图的代理模型为高保真计算流体动力学(CFD)求解器提供了快速替代方案,但其隐空间不透明且可控性差,限制了在安全关键场景中的应用。振荡流中的一个关键失效模式是相位漂移:预测结果定性正确,但逐渐失去与观测的时间对齐,制约了数字孪生和闭环控制的应用。重新训练来纠正此问题代价高昂且不适用于部署阶段。本文提出一种针对预训练图基CFD模型的相位调制框架,结合合适的表征与干预机制。为获得可有效操控的解耦表征,我们在冻结的MeshGraphNet嵌入上使用稀疏自编码器(SAEs)。为实现动态调控,我们超越静态的逐特征干预(如缩放或钳制),引入一种时序一致、相位感知的方法:通过希尔伯特分析识别振荡特征对,利用SVD将空间场投影到低秩时间系数,并施加平滑的时间变化旋转以推进或延迟周期模式,同时保持振幅-相位结构。在与主成分分析(PCA)和原始嵌入空间对比的无表示依赖设置下,结果显示稀疏、解耦表征显著优于密集或纠缠表征,而静态干预在此动态设定中失效。总体而言,本工作表明,当干预机制尊重底层动力学时,隐空间调制可从语义领域拓展至时变物理系统,且用于可解释性的相同稀疏特征也可作为物理意义明确的控制轴。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Graph-based surrogate models provide fast alternatives to high-fidelity CFD solvers, but their opaque latent spaces and limited controllability restrict use in safety-critical settings. A key failure mode in oscillatory flows is phase drift, where predictions remain qualitatively correct but gradually lose temporal alignment with observations, limiting use in digital twins and closed-loop control. Correcting this through retraining is expensive and impractical during deployment. We ask whether phase drift can instead be corrected post hoc by manipulating the latent space of a frozen surrogate. We propose a phase-steering framework for pretrained graph-based CFD models that combines the right representation with the right intervention mechanism. To obtain disentangled representation for effective steering, we use sparse autoencoders (SAEs) on frozen MeshGraphNet embeddings. To steer dynamics, we move beyond static per-feature interventions such as scaling or clamping, and introduce a temporally coherent, phase-aware method. Specifically, we identify oscillatory feature pairs with Hilbert analysis, project spatial fields into low-rank temporal coefficients via SVD, and apply smooth time-varying rotations to advance or delay periodic modes while preserving amplitude-phase structure. Using a representation-agnostic setup, we compare SAE-based steering with PCA and raw embedding spaces under the same intervention pipeline. Results show that sparse, disentangled representations outperform dense or entangled ones, while static interventions fail in this dynamical setting. Overall, this work shows that latent-space steering can be extended from semantic domains to time-dependent physical systems when interventions respect the underlying dynamics, and that the same sparse features used for interpretability can also serve as physically meaningful control axes.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。