arXiv:2604.05564cs.CL2026-04

用检索增强的LLM提升拉丁语依存句法分析,诗歌任务提升17分

THIVLVC: Retrieval Augmented Dependency Parsing for Latin

  • 先检索相似句,再用大模型结合示例和规范优化解析结果
  • 诗歌任务上比基线提升17点CLAS,散文任务提升1.5点
  • 适合处理拉丁语文本,尤其对标注不一致场景有鲁棒性

我们介绍THIVLVC,一种用于EvaLatin 2026依存句法分析任务的两阶段系统。给定拉丁语句子,通过句长和词性n元组相似性从CIRCSE语料库中检索结构相似条目,再利用大语言模型结合检索示例与UD标注规范,对UDPipe生成的初始解析进行优化。提交了两种配置:无检索和带检索(RAG)。在诗歌(塞内加)任务中,THIVLVC相比UDPipe基线提升17点CLAS;在散文(托马斯·阿奎那)任务中,提升1.5点CLAS。对300个系统与标准答案差异的双盲错误分析显示,在一致标注中53.3%倾向支持THIVLVC,揭示了树库内部及跨树库的标注不一致性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

We describe THIVLVC, a two-stage system for the EvaLatin 2026 Dependency Parsing task. Given a Latin sentence, we retrieve structurally similar entries from the CIRCSE treebank using sentence length and POS n-gram similarity, then prompt a large language model to refine the baseline parse from UDPipe using the retrieved examples and UD annotation guidelines. We submit two configurations: one without retrieval and one with retrieval (RAG). On poetry (Seneca), THIVLVC improves CLAS by +17 points over the UDPipe baseline; on prose (Thomas Aquinas), the gain is +1.5 CLAS. A double-blind error analysis of 300 divergences between our system and the gold standard reveals that, among unanimous annotator decisions, 53.3% favour THIVLVC, showing annotation inconsistencies both within and across treebanks.

依存句法拉丁语RAG大模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。