青少年使用语音助手时，隐私权衡受风险收益与控制接受度双重拉扯。
Negotiating Privacy with Smart Voice Assistants: Risk-Benefit and Control-Acceptance Tensions
- 构建风险收益与控制接受度双指数框架，量化隐私决策张力。
- 469名16-24岁青年数据表明，两种张力均影响隐私保护行为。
- 高频使用者更倾向便利导向，牺牲感知控制，揭示隐私悖论新视角。
智能语音助手（SVAs）在青年群体中广泛使用，但其隐私决策常面临多重考量而非明确偏好。本研究基于469名加拿大16-24岁青年的调查数据，提出基于谈判的隐私决策框架，引入两个复合指数：风险-收益张力指数（RBTI）和控制-接受张力指数（CATI）。结果表明，两个指数均显著关联隐私保护行为。频繁使用SVA者呈现更偏重收益与接受度的谈判特征，暗示便利性驱动的使用可能以牺牲感知控制为代价。该研究将隐私决策重新定义为动态协商过程，提供一种简洁测量工具，有助于理解青年在语音生态中应对多重隐私压力的方式。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Smart Voice assistants (SVAs) are widely adopted by youth, yet privacy decision-making in these environments is often characterized by competing considerations rather than clear-cut preferences. While our prior research has examined privacy risks, benefits, trust, and self-efficacy as distinct predictors of behavior, less attention has been paid to how these factors combine into higher-level tension that shapes privacy outcomes. This study introduces a negotiation-based framework for understanding youth privacy decision-making with SVAs by operationalizing two composite indices: the Risk-Benefit Tension Index (RBTI) and the Control-Acceptance Tension Index (CATI), using survey data from 469 Canadian youth aged 16-24. We examine the distribution of these indices and their relationship with privacy-protective behavior and SVA usage. Results show that both indices are meaningfully associated with protective action. Frequent SVA usage exhibits more benefit-dominant and acceptance-leaning negotiation profiles, suggesting that convenience-driven engagement may come at the expense of perceived control. By reframing privacy decision-making as a process of negotiation rather than inconsistency, this study offers a complementary perspective on the privacy paradox and provides a compact measurement approach for capturing how youth navigate competing privacy pressures in voice-enabled ecosystems.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。