GPT从文本模型演变为多模态工具系统,重塑AI应用边界。
From GPT-3 to GPT-5: Mapping their capabilities, scope, limitations, and consequences
- 从单一文本预测转向多模态、工具化、长上下文集成系统
- 幻觉、提示敏感等核心问题持续存在,透明度仍不足
- 适合关注AI系统演化与治理的开发者、政策制定者
本文系统梳理了GPT系列从GPT-3到GPT-5的演进历程,聚焦技术框架、用户交互、模态能力、部署架构与治理视角的变革。研究基于官方技术报告、系统卡片、API文档、产品公告与同行评议文献,指出后续版本不仅是参数量增长或准确率提升,更标志着从单任务文本预测向对齐、多模态、工具导向、长上下文、流程整合系统的转变。这种演变使模型间比较复杂化:产品路由、工具调用、安全调优与界面设计均构成有效系统的一部分。尽管能力显著提升,但幻觉、提示敏感性、基准脆弱性、领域与人群表现不均、训练架构公开不足等局限长期存在。该演进深刻影响软件开发、教育实践、信息工作、界面设计及前沿模型治理讨论。我们认为,从GPT-3到GPT-5的跨越,不仅是模型能力的跃迁,更是对可部署AI系统本质、评估方式与责任归属的重新定义。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We present the progress of the GPT family from GPT-3 through GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, and the GPT-5 family. Our work is comparative rather than merely historical. We investigates how the family evolved in technical framing, user interaction, modality, deployment architecture, and governance viewpoint. The work focuses on five recurring themes: technical progression, capability changes, deployment shifts, persistent limitations, and downstream consequences. In term of research design, we consider official technical reports, system cards, API and model documentation, product announcements, release notes, and peer-reviewed secondary studies. A primary assertion is that later GPT generations should not be interpreted only as larger or more accurate language models. Instead, the family evolves from a scaled few-shot text predictor into a set of aligned, multimodal, tool-oriented, long-context, and increasingly workflow-integrated systems. This development complicates simple model-to-model comparison because product routing, tool access, safety tuning, and interface design become part of the effective system. Across generations, several limitations remain unchanged: hallucination, prompt sensitivity, benchmark fragility, uneven behavior across domains and populations, and incomplete public transparency about architecture and training. However, the family has evolved software development, educational practice, information work, interface design, and discussions of frontier-model governance. We infer that the transition from GPT-3 to GPT-5 is best understood not only as an improvement in model capability, but also as a broader reformulation of what a deployable AI system is, how it is evaluated, and where responsibility should be located when such systems are used at scale.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。