为计算类课程制定AI工具使用规范,平衡教学效率与学术诚信。
Use of AI Tools: Guidelines to Maintain Academic Integrity in Computing Colleges
- 分类评估方式并分析AI对每类的影响
- 提出通用指南与具体评估场景建议
- 构建数学模型评估AI辅助作业的可信度
AI工具如ChatGPT的快速普及深刻改变了计算学科的教学实践,显著提升了学习效率、学术自我效能感和信心。然而,其广泛应用也对学术诚信——教育体系的核心支柱——带来严峻挑战。本文系统分析计算类课程中常见评估方式受AI工具影响的程度,并在此基础上提出适用于各类评估形式的通用指导原则,帮助教师合理融入AI工具。同时,针对不同评估类型提供具体建议,以保障教学目标实现并降低学术不端风险。最后,提出一个形式化数学模型,用于在存在AI辅助的情况下结构化评估学生表现,为教师提供可操作的决策框架。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The rapid adoption of AI tools such as ChatGPT has significantly transformed academic practices, offering considerable benefits for both students and faculty in computing disciplines. These tools have been shown to enhance learning efficiency, academic self-efficacy, and confidence. However, their increasing use also raises pressing concerns regarding the preservation of academic integrity -- an essential pillar of the educational process. This paper explores the implications of widespread AI tool usage within computing colleges, with a particular focus on how to align their use with the principles of academic honesty. We begin by classifying common assessment techniques employed in computing education and examine how each may be impacted by AI-assisted tools. Building on this foundation, we propose a set of general guidelines applicable across various assessment formats to help instructors responsibly integrate AI tools into their pedagogy. Furthermore, we provide targeted, assessment-specific recommendations designed to uphold educational objectives while mitigating risks of academic misconduct. These guidelines serve as a practical framework for instructors aiming to balance the pedagogical advantages of AI tools with the imperative of maintaining academic integrity in computing education. Finally, we introduce a formal model that provides a structured mathematical framework for evaluating student assessments in the presence of AI-assisted tools.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。