为印度医疗数据共享设计激励框架,解决碎片化与低激励问题。
A Proposed Biomedical Data Policy Framework to Reduce Fragmentation, Improve Quality, and Incentivize Sharing in Indian Healthcare in the era of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health
- 构建多层激励机制,将数据工作纳入职称评审和排名体系。
- 引入谢尔利值分配收益,推动联邦学习中公平协作。
- 适配数据保护法规,适合政策制定者与研究机构参考。
印度通过研究生研究、政府医院服务与审计、政府项目、私立医院及其电子病历(EMR)系统、保险计划及独立诊所产生大量生物医学数据,但这些资源分散于机构孤岛和厂商锁定的EMR系统中。根本瓶颈并非技术,而是经济与学术激励错配,导致数据共享对个人研究者和机构而言风险高、回报低。若国家医学委员会(NMC)职称评定、国家机构排名框架(NIRF)、资助机制不明确认可并奖励数据整理工作,印度的人工智能医疗愿景将受限于孤立且不可互操作的数据集。本文提出多层次激励架构:在NMC晋升标准中纳入数据论文认可;将开放数据指标纳入NIRF;在联邦学习联盟中采用谢尔利值(Shapley Value)进行收益分配;设立机构数据管理师为主流职业角色。针对数据质量审查恐惧、误读担忧和选择性报告偏差等关键障碍,通过强制数据质量评估、结构化同行评审以及为审核角色授予学术信用加以应对。该框架直接回应2023年《数字个人数据保护法》(DPDPA)约束,并积极对接《国家数据共享与可及性政策》(NDSAP)、Biotech-PRIDE指南及安努桑丹国家科研基金会(ANRF)指南。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
India generates vast biomedical data through postgraduate research, government hospital services and audits, government schemes, private hospitals and their electronic medical record (EMR) systems, insurance programs and standalone clinics. Unfortunately, these resources remain fragmented across institutional silos and vendor-locked EMR systems. The fundamental bottleneck is not technological but economic and academic. There is a systemic misalignment of incentives that renders data sharing a high-risk, low-reward activity for individual researchers and institutions. Until India's academic promotion criteria, institutional rankings, and funding mechanisms explicitly recognize and reward data curation as professional work, the nation's AI ambitions will remain constrained by fragmented, non-interoperable datasets. We propose a multi-layered incentive architecture integrating recognition of data papers in National Medical Commission (NMC) promotion criteria, incorporation of open data metrics into the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), adoption of Shapley Value-based revenue sharing in federated learning consortia, and establishment of institutional data stewardship as a mainstream professional role. Critical barriers to data sharing, including fear of data quality scrutiny, concerns about misinterpretation, and selective reporting bias, are addressed through mandatory data quality assessment, structured peer review, and academic credit for auditing roles. The proposed framework directly addresses regulatory constraints introduced by the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 (DPDPA), while constructively engaging with the National Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy (NDSAP), Biotech-PRIDE Guidelines, and the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF) guidelines.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。