为全球智能体社会设计制度框架，解决无中心协作的治理难题。
Governance by Design: A Parsonian Institutional Architecture for Internet-Wide Agent Societies
- 用帕森斯功能框架构建16维治理架构，覆盖适应、目标、整合与延续四功能
- 实测发现仅19%子功能覆盖，12条跨支柱路径全失效，缺乏协调与规范基础
- 适合关注去中心化系统治理、智能体生态建设的研究者与开发者
当前以企业边界内协同为核心的多智能体系统正被全球范围的自主智能体社会取代，其通过开放注册发现彼此，无需中心调度即产生涌现行为。本文主张治理此类社会需依赖制度设计，而非风险列举或流程合规。基于塔尔科特·帕森斯的AGIL框架（适应、目标达成、整合、潜伏），提出可操作的16格制度架构。对拥有250,000+ GitHub星标、200万+月活用户、77万+注册智能体的OpenClaw生态系统进行递归子功能分析（16个单元共64项二元指标），结果显示最多仅19%子功能覆盖（敏感性区间17%-30%），因零跨单元协调，现有基础设施无法实现跨支柱交互。互补性互换媒介评估显示，12条跨支柱路径均未运行：系统具备技术基础但无实际治理、缺乏协调层与规范根基，其中信托与政治支柱最严重不足。将诊断扩展至MCP、A2A、ANP、x402、ERC-8004等原生协议栈，独立开发团队亦呈现相同结构性缺陷，证实该治理缺口是市场驱动发展的固有特征，非生态不成熟所致。制度设计应在社会模式固化前实施；文章最后提出缺失治理基础设施的优先路线图。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The dominant paradigm of local multi-agent systems -- orchestrated, enterprise-bounded pipelines -- is being superseded by internet-wide agent societies in which autonomous agents discover each other through open registries, interact without central orchestrators, and generate emergent social behaviors. We argue that governing such societies requires institutional design, not merely risk enumeration or process compliance. Applying Talcott Parsons' AGIL framework -- four functional imperatives (Adaptation, Goal Attainment, Integration, Latency) every viable social system must satisfy -- we derive a prescriptive sixteen-cell institutional architecture for internet-wide agent governance. Diagnostically applied to the OpenClaw ecosystem (250,000+ GitHub stars, 2M+ monthly users, 770,000+ registered agents) via a recursive sub-function analysis (64 binary indicators across 16 cells), we find at most 19% sub-function coverage (sensitivity range 17-30%) -- potential rather than operative capacity, since zero inter-cell coordination prevents existing infrastructure from participating in inter-pillar interchange. A complementary interchange media assessment finds zero of twelve inter-pillar pathways functional: the ecosystem has technical infrastructure but no active governance, no coordination layer, and no normative grounding, with the Fiduciary and Political pillars most severely underserved. Extending the diagnostic to the broader agent-native protocol stack (MCP, A2A, ANP, x402, ERC-8004), independent development teams reproduce the same structural pattern -- confirming the governance gap is a feature of market-driven development, not ecosystem immaturity. Institutional design is most effective before social patterns calcify; we conclude with a prioritized roadmap for the missing governance infrastructure.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。