arXiv:2604.12304cs.LGcs.SY2026-04

5分钟级用电预测中,历史用电模式比天气更重要。

Beyond Weather Correlation: A Comparative Study of Static and Temporal Neural Architectures for Fine-Grained Residential Energy Consumption Forecasting in Melbourne, Australia

  • 用LSTM捕捉用电序列的时序依赖,优于仅依赖天气的MLP。
  • LSTM在两户家庭上分别达到R²=0.883和0.865,远超MLP。
  • 适合关注高分辨率用电预测的电网与能源研究者。

在亚小时级(5分钟)分辨率下,精准的居民用电量短期预测对智能电网管理、需求响应及可再生能源整合至关重要。尽管天气变量被广泛认为是影响居民用电的关键因素,但在澳大利亚家庭中,是否应引入时序自相关性(即过去用电的连续记忆)而非仅依赖静态气象特征,仍缺乏充分研究。本文对多层感知机(MLP)与长短期记忆网络(LSTM)进行了严谨的实证比较,数据来自墨尔本两个真实住户:House 3(标准并网住宅)与House 4(带屋顶光伏系统)。两模型均基于2023年3月至2024年4月共14个月的5分钟间隔智能电表数据(每户超117,000样本),并融合澳洲气象局(BOM)每日天气观测。其中,基于24步(2小时)滑动窗口的LSTM分别取得R² = 0.883(House 3)和R² = 0.865(House 4),而对应天气驱动的MLP仅达R² = -0.055 和 R² = 0.410,差距分别为93.8和45.5个百分点。结果表明,在5分钟粒度下,用电序列的时序自相关性显著主导气象信息。此外,我们发现光伏系统的引入造成不对称性:对于光伏住户,MLP的R² = 0.410,说明其隐含利用了天气-时间关联进行太阳能预测。通过持久性基线分析与季节分层进一步验证模型表现。本文建议未来可探索天气增强型LSTM与联邦学习等方向。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Accurate short-term residential energy consumption forecasting at sub-hourly resolution is critical for smart grid management, demand response programmes, and renewable energy integration. While weather variables are widely acknowledged as key drivers of residential electricity demand, the relative merit of incorporating temporal autocorrelation - the sequential memory of past consumption; over static meteorological features alone remains underexplored at fine-grained (5-minute) temporal resolution for Australian households. This paper presents a rigorous empirical comparison of a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent network applied to two real-world Melbourne households: House 3 (a standard grid-connected dwelling) and House 4 (a rooftop solar photovoltaic-integrated household). Both models are trained on 14 months of 5-minute interval smart meter data (March 2023-April 2024) merged with official Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) daily weather observations, yielding over 117,000 samples per household. The LSTM, operating on 24-step (2-hour) sliding consumption windows, achieves coefficients of determination of R^2 = 0.883 (House 3) and R^2 = 0.865 (House 4), compared to R^2 = -0.055 and R^2 = 0.410 for the corresponding weather-driven MLPs - differences of 93.8 and 45.5 percentage points. These results establish that temporal autocorrelation in the consumption sequence dominates meteorological information for short-term forecasting at 5-minute granularity. Additionally, we demonstrate an asymmetry introduced by solar generation: for the PV-integrated household, the MLP achieves R^2 = 0.410, revealing implicit solar forecasting from weather-time correlations. A persistence baseline analysis and seasonal stratification contextualise model performance. We propose a hybrid weather-augmented LSTM and federated learning extensions as directions for future work.

用电预测LSTM时序建模能源系统

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。