arXiv:2604.13059cs.CLcs.AI2026-04被引 1

打造实时医生-患者对话的主动式病历助手,提升诊疗记录准确性与效率。

A Proactive EMR Assistant for Doctor-Patient Dialogue: Streaming ASR, Belief Stabilization, and Preliminary Controlled Evaluation

  • 构建端到端实时系统,融合流式语音识别与信念稳定机制。
  • 在模拟测试中实现84%事件召回率、87%检索准确率及超80%风险识别率。
  • 适合医疗信息化研究者与智能辅助诊疗系统开发者参考。

大多数基于对话的电子病历(EMR)系统仍为被动流程:转录语音、提取信息、会诊后生成报告。这种设计虽提升文档效率,但难以支持主动诊疗辅助,因未解决流式语音噪声、缺失标点、诊断信念不稳定、客观化质量差及可衡量下一步行动收益等问题。本文提出一个端到端主动式EMR助手,核心包括流式语音识别、标点恢复、状态感知信息抽取、信念稳定、客观化检索、行动规划与可回放报告生成。系统在初步控制实验中使用10段流式医患对话和跨对话聚合的300个查询检索基准进行评估。完整系统达到状态事件F1 0.84,检索Recall@5 0.87,端到端试点得分覆盖率达83.3%,结构完整性81.4%,风险识别率80.0%。消融实验表明,标点恢复与信念稳定有助于提升下游抽取、检索与行动选择表现。结果来自受控模拟试点环境,不代表临床部署能力或真实世界有效性,仅表明该在线架构在严格控制条件下具备技术一致性与方向性支持潜力。本研究应视为受限条件下的概念验证,非临床部署证据。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Most dialogue-based electronic medical record (EMR) systems still behave as passive pipelines: transcribe speech, extract information, and generate the final note after the consultation. That design improves documentation efficiency, but it is insufficient for proactive consultation support because it does not explicitly address streaming speech noise, missing punctuation, unstable diagnostic belief, objectification quality, or measurable next-action gains. We present an end-to-end proactive EMR assistant built around streaming speech recognition, punctuation restoration, stateful extraction, belief stabilization, objectified retrieval, action planning, and replayable report generation. The system is evaluated in a preliminary controlled setting using ten streamed doctor-patient dialogues and a 300-query retrieval benchmark aggregated across dialogues. The full system reaches state-event F1 of 0.84, retrieval Recall@5 of 0.87, and end-to-end pilot scores of 83.3% coverage, 81.4% structural completeness, and 80.0% risk recall. Ablations further suggest that punctuation restoration and belief stabilization may improve downstream extraction, retrieval, and action selection within this pilot. These results were obtained under a controlled simulated pilot setting rather than broad deployment claims, and they should not be read as evidence of clinical deployment readiness, clinical safety, or real-world clinical utility. Instead, they suggest that the proposed online architecture may be technically coherent and directionally supportive under tightly controlled pilot conditions. The present study should be read as a pilot concept demonstration under tightly controlled pilot conditions rather than as evidence of clinical deployment readiness or clinical generalizability.

医疗AI语音识别病历生成主动辅助

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。