量子编码中,相位信息并非必须,混合模型靠经典部分补足缺失相位。
Magnitude Is All You Need? Rethinking Phase in Quantum Encoding of Complex SAR Data

- 仅用幅度编码在混合量子模型中表现更优
- 3类任务准确率达99.57%,8类任务达71.19%
- 纯量子模型依赖相位,可提升21.65个百分点
合成孔径雷达(SAR)数据为复数,量子机器学习(QML)也运行于复希尔伯特空间。本研究在MSTAR基准数据集上对比五种量子编码策略:仅幅度编码、幅度-相位联合编码、同相与正交编码、预处理相位编码及纯量子架构。结果出人意料:在混合量子-经典模型中,仅使用幅度的编码在3类任务中达到99.57%准确率,在8类任务中达71.19%,优于含相位的编码;加入相位信息几乎无提升,甚至降低性能。而在仅有184至224个可训练参数的纯量子模型中,相位信息极为关键,可使准确率最高提升21.65个百分点。表明相位作用不仅取决于数据,更取决于模型架构:混合模型可通过经典组件补偿相位缺失,而纯量子模型则高度依赖相位进行判别。该研究为复杂数据的量子编码提供了实践指导,强调编码与架构需协同设计。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data is inherently complex-valued, while quantum machine learning (QML) models operate in complex Hilbert spaces. This similarity suggests that using both the magnitude and phase of SAR data in quantum encoding should help automatic target recognition in SAR images. In this study, we test this assumption by comparing five encoding strategies for quantum models: magnitude-only encoding, joint magnitude-phase encoding, in-phase and quadrature encoding, preprocessed phase encoding, and a purely quantum architecture. All approaches are evaluated under a unified experimental setup on the MSTAR benchmark dataset. Surprisingly, we find that magnitude-only encoding performs better than phase-inclusive encodings in hybrid quantum-classical models. It achieves 99.57 percent accuracy on the 3-class task and 71.19 percent accuracy on the 8-class task, outperforming complex-valued alternatives under the same framework. Adding phase information provides little or no improvement and can sometimes degrade performance. However, in purely quantum models with only 184 to 224 trainable parameters and no classical neural-network layers, phase information becomes much more important, improving accuracy by up to 21.65 percentage points. These findings show that the usefulness of phase information depends not only on the data, but also on the architecture used to process it. Hybrid models can compensate for missing phase information through their classical components, while pure quantum models rely more strongly on phase information for class discrimination. The results provide practical guidance for encoding complex-valued data in quantum machine learning and highlight the importance of jointly designing encoding strategies and model architectures for current quantum systems.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。