arXiv:2604.14898cs.AIcs.CY2026-04被引 3

让人类与AI共同思考,通过对话实现可追踪的推理过程。

Governing Reflective Human-AI Collaboration: A Framework for Epistemic Scaffolding and Traceable Reasoning

  • 将反思性推理置于人机交互层,形成协同认知协议。
  • 通过三阶段对话循环(抽象-阐述-反思)构建可审计的推理链。
  • 适合关注AI透明度、合规性的研究者与实践者使用。

大语言模型虽在快速进化,从模式识别发展到初步推理能力,但始终局限于语言模拟而非真实理解。它们能生成看似反思的流畅输出,却缺乏时间连续性、因果反馈以及与现实互动的锚定。本文提出一种互补方法:将推理视为人类与模型之间分布式的关系过程,而非单一实体的内在能力。基于近期关于“系统2”学习的研究,我们把反思性推理重新定位到交互层。不依赖模型内部工程化推理,而是将其构建成可结构、可测量、可管理的认知协议。该视角强调协作智能,融合人类判断与情境理解,结合机器的速度、记忆与联想能力。我们引入“建筑师之笔”作为具体方法:如同建筑师通过绘图思考,人类利用模型作为结构化反思的外部媒介。通过在人机交互中嵌入表达、批判与修订阶段,对话本身成为推理循环——人类抽象→模型阐述→人类反思。这将问题从‘模型能否思考’转变为‘人机系统能否推理’。该框架支持可审计的推理痕迹,契合欧盟人工智能法案与ISO/IEC 42001等新兴治理标准,为实现更透明、可控、可问责的AI应用提供可行路径,无需改变现有模型架构。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large language models have advanced rapidly, from pattern recognition to emerging forms of reasoning, yet they remain confined to linguistic simulation rather than grounded understanding. They can produce fluent outputs that resemble reflection, but lack temporal continuity, causal feedback, and anchoring in real-world interaction. This paper proposes a complementary approach in which reasoning is treated as a relational process distributed between human and model rather than an internal capability of either. Building on recent work on "System-2" learning, we relocate reflective reasoning to the interaction layer. Instead of engineering reasoning solely within models, we frame it as a cognitive protocol that can be structured, measured, and governed using existing systems. This perspective emphasizes collaborative intelligence, combining human judgment and contextual understanding with machine speed, memory, and associative capacity. We introduce "The Architect's Pen" as a practical method. Like an architect who thinks through drawing, the human uses the model as an external medium for structured reflection. By embedding phases of articulation, critique, and revision into human-AI interaction, the dialogue itself becomes a reasoning loop: human abstraction -> model articulation -> human reflection. This reframes the question from whether the model can think to whether the human-AI system can reason. The framework enables auditable reasoning traces and supports alignment with emerging governance standards, including the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001. It provides a practical path toward more transparent, controllable, and accountable AI use without requiring new model architectures.

人机协作可解释性推理机制

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。