让一个人同时存在于多个地方，靠的是能复制思维与情感的AI分身。
Distributed Human Identity: AI-Enabled Multi-Existence Through Cognitive Replication and Robotic Embodiments
- 用认知模拟和同步层构建可跨数字、机器人、软件运行的意识分身。
- 分身具备情绪共鸣与情境响应能力，能真实代表本体行动。
- 适合研究人机融合、远程工作或智能护理的人看。
人类存在长期受限于物理身体，一人只能在一个地点出现。本文提出多存在身份（MEI）——一种社会技术框架，将个体的认知、行为与情感属性复制到由AI驱动的实体中，使其能在数字与物理空间并行运作。与数字孪生、远程呈现和多重化身不同，MEI通过嵌入认知保真度、情感共鸣与情境响应能力，使分布式代理不仅代表原主体，更成为其延伸。该框架整合人格建模、认知仿真与同步层，支持三种表现通道：数字化身、机器人实体与自主软件代理。不同于模拟助手，MEI将复制身份视为动态且文化嵌入的自我扩展，强调隐性互动与关系真实性。应用涵盖专业工作、教育、医疗、治理、家庭生活与媒体，有望显著提升生产力、照护能力、领导力与创造力。但同时也引发真实性、同意、法律问责、隐私及存在意义等深层挑战。文章提出分阶段实证路线：人格建模、同步测试、机器人实验与伦理压力测试。通过将MEI视为技术和文化的双重建构，研究重新定义了数字增强社会中的身份与存在议题，既展现人机融合潜力，也强调需建立包容性伦理治理。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Human presence has traditionally been constrained by the limits of physical embodiment, allowing individuals to exist in only one place at a time. This article introduces Multi-Existence Identity (MEI)- a socio-technical framework that replicates cognitive, behavioral, and emotional attributes into AI-enabled embodiments capable of acting across digital and physical contexts in parallel. MEI advances beyond digital twins, telepresence, and multipresence avatars by embedding cognitive fidelity, affective resonance, and contextual responsiveness into distributed agents that function not only for, but as, the original individual. The framework integrates personality modeling, cognitive simulation, and a synchronization layer to maintain identity coherence across three embodiment channels: digital avatars, robotic embodiments, and agentic software agents. Differentiating itself from simulated assistants, MEI positions replicated identity as a dynamic and culturally situated extension of selfhood, foregrounding tacit engagement and relational authenticity. Application domains span professional work, education, healthcare, governance, family life, and media, offering transformative potential for productivity, caregiving, leadership, and creativity. Yet these opportunities also surface profound challenges concerning authenticity, consent, legal accountability, privacy, and the psychological meaning of presence. The article proposes a phased empirical roadmap to operationalize MEI through personality modeling, synchronization testing, robotic embodiment trials, and ethical stress-testing. By conceptualizing MEI as both a technological and cultural construct, the study reframes debates on identity and presence in digitally augmented societies, highlighting opportunities for human-AI integration while underscoring the need for inclusive ethical governance.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。