arXiv:2604.16379cs.IRcs.CL2026-04

无需训练的推荐框架,用大模型推理解决工业场景数据稀疏问题

LLMAR: A Tuning-Free Recommendation Framework for Sparse and Text-Rich Industrial Domains

论文配图:LLMAR: A Tuning-Free Recommendation Framework for Sparse and Text-Rich Industrial Domains
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用大模型将用户行为转化为语义动机,实现基于推理的匹配
  • 自校正机制降低幻觉,提升历史与当前指令的协调性
  • 零微调设计,适合对实时性要求不高的企业级推荐场景

工业B2B应用(如工地风险预测、材料采购)面临极端数据稀疏却文本丰富的挑战。传统基于ID的协同过滤因缺乏共现信号失效,而微调大型语言模型成本高且难以应对频繁的数据漂移。本文提出无训练推荐框架LLMAR(LLM-Annotated Recommendation),通过系统集成大模型推理,捕捉用户“潜在动机”而无需任何训练。核心贡献包括:(1) 推理驱动标注:利用大模型将行为历史转化为结构化语义动机,实现ID方法无法达到的推理匹配;(2) 反思循环:自校正机制优化生成查询,缓解幻觉并解决历史与当前指令间的“上下文竞争”;(3) 低成本架构:采用无训练组件与异步批量处理,极大降低维护成本。在公开基准(MovieLens-1M、Amazon Prime Pantry)和一个稀疏工业数据集(工地风险预测)上的评估显示,LLMAR优于现有学习型模型(SASRecF),在工业数据集上nDCG@10最高提升54.6%。推理成本可控,约每千用户1美元。对于实时延迟要求不严的B2B领域,结合大模型推理与自我验证,在准确率、可解释性和运营成本上均优于训练型方法。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Industrial B2B applications (e.g., construction site risk prediction, material procurement) face extreme data sparsity yet feature rich textual interactions. In such environments, traditional ID-based collaborative filtering fails lacking co-occurrence signals, while fine-tuning standard Large Language Models (LLMs) incurs high operational costs and struggles with frequent data drift. We propose LLMAR (LLM-Annotated Recommendation), a tuning-free framework. Moving beyond simple embeddings, LLMAR systematically integrates LLM reasoning to capture user "latent motives" without any training process. We introduce three core contributions: (1) Inference-Driven Annotation: uses LLMs to transform behavioral history into structured semantic motives, enabling reasoning-based matching unattainable by ID-based methods; (2) Reflection Loop: a self-correction mechanism that refines generated queries to mitigate hallucinations and resolve "context competition" between past history and current instructions; and (3) Cost-Effective Architecture: relies on tuning-free components and asynchronous batch processing to minimize maintenance costs. Evaluations on public benchmarks (MovieLens-1M, Amazon Prime Pantry) and a sparse industrial dataset (construction risk prediction) demonstrate that LLMAR outperforms state-of-the-art learning-based models (SASRecF), achieving up to a 54.6% nDCG@10 improvement on the industrial dataset. Inference costs remain highly practical (~$1 per 1,000 users). For B2B domains where strict real-time latency is not critical, combining LLM reasoning with self-verification offers a superior alternative to training-based approaches across accuracy, explainability, and operational cost.

推荐系统大模型应用无训练工业场景

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。