动态3D高斯点云过拟合主因是变形不连贯,非参数量过多。
Incoherent Deformation, Not Capacity: Diagnosing and Mitigating Overfitting in Dynamic Gaussian Splatting

- 通过正则化高斯体形变场的平滑性,提升泛化能力。
- 在D-NeRF上使训练测试差距从6.18dB降至2.54dB,降幅超57%。
- 适合关注视频3D重建泛化性的研究者和工程师。
动态3D高斯点云方法在单目视频上训练视图的PSNR表现优异,但泛化能力差:在D-NeRF基准上平均训练-测试PSNR差距达6.18dB,个别场景高达11dB。我们发现两个关键因素:其一,分裂机制导致超过80%的差距——禁用分裂使高斯点数从44K降至3K,PSNR差距从6.18dB降至1.15dB;所有阈值消融实验中,差距与点数呈对数线性关系(r=0.995,置信区间[0.99,1.00]),暗示容量解释。其二,容量解释不完整:引入局部平滑性惩罚(弹性能量正则化,EER),在点云增加85%的情况下将差距减少40.8%;直接测量训练模型中的每点应变,EER使平均应变降低99.72%(中位数99.80%),且8/8场景下中位应变低于基线1%分位数水平。结合GAD(损失率感知密度阈值)与PTDrop(抖动加权丢弃),在相同λ下实现57%的差距缩减。该结论在不同形变架构(Deformable-3DGS)及真实单目视频(4 HyperNeRF场景)中均成立,验证了变形连贯性对泛化的决定性作用。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Dynamic 3D Gaussian Splatting methods achieve strong training-view PSNR on monocular video but generalize poorly: on the D-NeRF benchmark we measure an average train-test PSNR gap of 6.18 dB, rising to 11 dB on individual scenes. We report two findings that together account for most of that gap. Finding 1 (the role of splitting). A systematic ablation of the Adaptive Density Control pipeline (split, clone, prune, frequency, threshold, schedule) shows that splitting is responsible for over 80% of the gap: disabling split collapses the cloud from 44K to 3K Gaussians and the gap from 6.18 dB to 1.15 dB. Across all threshold-varying ablations, gap is log-linear in count (r = 0.995, bootstrap 95% CI [0.99, 1.00]), which suggests a capacity-based explanation. Finding 2 (the role of deformation coherence). We show that the capacity explanation is incomplete. A local-smoothness penalty on the per-Gaussian deformation field -- Elastic Energy Regularization (EER) -- reduces the gap by 40.8% while growing the cloud by 85%. Measuring per-Gaussian strain directly on trained checkpoints, EER reduces mean strain by 99.72% (median 99.80%) across all 8 scenes; on 8/8 scenes the median Gaussian under EER is less strained than the 1st-percentile (best-behaved) Gaussian under baseline. Alongside EER, we evaluate two further regularizers: GAD, a loss-rate-aware densification threshold, and PTDrop, a jitter-weighted Gaussian dropout. GAD+EER reduces the gap by 48%; adding PTDrop and a soft growth cap reaches 57%. We confirm that coherence generalizes to (a) a different deformation architecture (Deformable-3DGS, +40.6% gap reduction at re-tuned lambda), and (b) real monocular video (4 HyperNeRF scenes, reducing the mean PSNR gap by 14.9% at the same lambda as D-NeRF, with near-zero quality cost). The overfitting in dynamic 3DGS is driven by incoherent deformation, not parameter count.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。