arXiv:2604.17674cs.CLcs.AI2026-04

用轻量CNN高效准确分类法律文书引用类型,比BERT快13倍

Towards Intelligent Legal Document Analysis: CNN-Driven Classification of Case Law Texts

论文配图:Towards Intelligent Legal Document Analysis: CNN-Driven Classification of Case Law Texts
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 结合词干化预处理与子词感知嵌入,用多核一维CNN提取特征
  • 在2.5万份标注文档上达97.26%准确率,F1-score 96.82%
  • 模型仅510万参数,推理速度0.31毫秒/文档,适合实际部署

法律从业者和司法机构面临大量案卷文档,其语言正式、句式冗长且术语专业,人工筛选耗时易错。本文提出一种轻量高精度的引用处理分类框架,结合词干化预处理、子词感知FastText嵌入与多核一维卷积神经网络(CNN)。在包含25,000份标注法律文档的公开语料库上,采用75/25训练测试划分,系统达到97.26%分类准确率与96.82%宏F1-score,优于微调BERT、LSTM+FastText、CNN+随机嵌入及TF-IDF-KNN等基线模型。该模型还获得97.83%最高AUC-ROC值,仅需510万参数,单文档推理延迟0.31毫秒,较BERT快13倍以上。消融实验验证各组件贡献,混淆矩阵显示残余错误集中于语义相近的引用类别。结果表明,精心设计的卷积架构是智能法律文档分析中可扩展、资源高效的轻量替代方案。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Legal practitioners and judicial institutions face an ever-growing volume of case-law documents characterised by formalised language, lengthy sentence structures, and highly specialised terminology, making manual triage both time-consuming and error-prone. This work presents a lightweight yet high-accuracy framework for citation-treatment classification that pairs lemmatisation-based preprocessing with subword-aware FastText embeddings and a multi-kernel one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Evaluated on a publicly available corpus of 25,000 annotated legal documents with a 75/25 training-test partition, the proposed system achieves 97.26% classification accuracy and a macro F1-score of 96.82%, surpassing established baselines including fine-tuned BERT, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) with FastText, CNN with random embeddings, and a Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) k-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) classifier. The model also attains the highest Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve of 97.83% among all compared systems while operating with only 5.1 million parameters and an inference latency of 0.31 ms per document - more than 13 times faster than BERT. Ablation experiments confirm the individual contribution of each pipeline component, and the confusion matrix reveals that residual errors are confined to semantically adjacent citation categories. These findings indicate that carefully designed convolutional architectures represent a scalable, resource-efficient alternative to heavyweight transformers for intelligent legal document analysis.

法律AI文本分类轻量模型CNN

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。