提出新评估方法CARE,更好衡量RAG系统在多跳推理中的表现。
Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning in RAG Systems: A Comparison of LLM-Based Retriever Evaluation Strategies
- 设计上下文感知评估法CARE,改进多跳检索的评价方式。
- CARE在大模型和长上下文场景下提升明显,多跳任务效果更优。
- 适合研究RAG评估、多跳问答或构建可靠检索系统的开发者。
检索增强生成(RAG)通过引入外部知识提升大语言模型(LLM)的回答准确性。然而,现有研究对RAG系统——尤其是检索器组件——的评估仍不充分,多数工作集中于单上下文检索,而非多跳查询(单个上下文孤立时看似无关,组合后才关键)。本文使用HotPotQA、MuSiQue和SQuAD数据集模拟RAG系统,对比三种基于LLM的评判策略,包括提出的上下文感知检索器评估(CARE)。实验基于OpenAI、Meta和Google的LLM进行,结果表明,在多跳推理任务中,CARE始终优于现有方法;性能提升在参数量更大、上下文窗口更长的模型上尤为显著;而单跳查询对上下文感知评估敏感度较低。整体表明,上下文感知评估对提升复杂查询场景下RAG系统的可靠性与准确性至关重要。为保证可复现性,实验数据已公开于https://github.com/lorenzbrehme/CARE。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge to answer questions more accurately. However, research on evaluating RAG systems-particularly the retriever component-remains limited, as most existing work focuses on single-context retrieval rather than multi-hop queries, where individual contexts may appear irrelevant in isolation but are essential when combined. In this research, we use the HotPotQA, MuSiQue, and SQuAD datasets to simulate a RAG system and compare three LLM-as-judge evaluation strategies, including our proposed Context-Aware Retriever Evaluation (CARE). Our goal is to better understand how multi-hop reasoning can be most effectively evaluated in RAG systems. Experiments with LLMs from OpenAI, Meta, and Google demonstrate that CARE consistently outperforms existing methods for evaluating multi-hop reasoning in RAG systems. The performance gains are most pronounced in models with larger parameter counts and longer context windows, while single-hop queries show minimal sensitivity to context-aware evaluation. Overall, the results highlight the critical role of context-aware evaluation in improving the reliability and accuracy of retrieval-augmented generation systems, particularly in complex query scenarios. To ensure reproducibility, we provide the complete data of our experiments at https://github.com/lorenzbrehme/CARE.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。