arXiv:2604.20614cs.LGmath.DS2026-04被引 1

通过调控训练过程中的边缘与曲率,提升模型置信度校准性。

Too Sharp, Too Sure: When Calibration Follows Curvature

论文配图:Too Sharp, Too Sure: When Calibration Follows Curvature
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 基于梯度方法的训练中,校准性与曲率、边缘紧密关联。
  • 校准误差随优化过程中的曲率变化而同步变化,相关性显著。
  • 新目标函数提升校准效果,适用于多种优化器且不损失准确率。

现代神经网络虽能达到高精度,但置信度估计常与实际正确率不匹配,即校准性差。现有研究多将校准视为事后调整属性,本文则从训练过程视角出发,在小型视觉任务上研究校准性如何受训练过程影响。我们发现,在多种基于梯度的方法下,校准性、曲率与分类边缘之间存在紧密耦合。实验证明,期望校准误差(ECE)在整个优化过程中与基于曲率的尖锐度高度相关。数学上,我们证明了ECE和高斯-牛顿曲率均受轨迹上同一类依赖边距的指数尾部泛函控制,仅相差特定问题常数。基于此机制,我们提出一种边缘感知的训练目标,显式优化鲁棒边缘尾部与局部平滑性,可在不牺牲精度的前提下,提升不同优化器下的样本外校准性能。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Modern neural networks can achieve high accuracy while remaining poorly calibrated, producing confidence estimates that do not match empirical correctness. Yet calibration is often treated as a post-hoc attribute. We take a different perspective: we study calibration as a training-time phenomenon on small vision tasks, and ask whether calibrated solutions can be obtained reliably by intervening on the training procedure. We identify a tight coupling between calibration, curvature, and margins during training of deep networks under multiple gradient-based methods. Empirically, Expected Calibration Error (ECE) closely tracks curvature-based sharpness throughout optimization. Mathematically, we show that both ECE and Gauss--Newton curvature are controlled, up to problem-specific constants, by the same margin-dependent exponential tail functional along the trajectory. Guided by this mechanism, we introduce a margin-aware training objective that explicitly targets robust-margin tails and local smoothness, yielding improved out-of-sample calibration across optimizers without sacrificing accuracy.

模型校准曲率分析训练优化置信度

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。