arXiv:2604.21327cs.LGcs.AI2026-04ACL被引 3

解决数学推理中测试时强化学习的虚假信号放大问题

Understanding and Mitigating Spurious Signal Amplification in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Math Reasoning

  • 通过频率采样剔除一致性中等的模糊样本,减少噪声输入
  • 采用固定优势的去偏优势估计,避免群体相对优化引入偏差
  • 基于共识的离线策略优化实现稳定高效模型更新,适合大模型数学推理

测试时强化学习(TTRL)在推理阶段通过伪标签动态调整模型,易受标签噪声带来的虚假优化信号影响。实证研究发现,中等一致性的响应构成模糊区域,是奖励噪声的主要来源;更关键的是,群体相对优势估计会进一步放大此类虚假信号。为此,提出统一框架DDRL:首先用基于频率的采样策略剔除模糊样本,保持正负例平衡;其次采用固定优势的去偏优势估计,消除群体相对策略优化引入的偏差;最后通过基于共识的离线策略精炼阶段,利用拒绝采样数据集实现高效稳定的模型更新。在三个大语言模型、多个数学推理基准上的实验表明,DDRL持续优于现有TTRL基线方法。代码将很快发布于https://github.com/yuyongcan/DDRL。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) always adapts models at inference time via pseudo-labeling, leaving it vulnerable to spurious optimization signals from label noise. Through an empirical study, we observe that responses with medium consistency form an ambiguity region and constitute the primary source of reward noise. Crucially, we find that such spurious signals can be even amplified through group-relative advantage estimation. Motivated by these findings, we propose a unified framework, Debiased and Denoised test-time Reinforcement Learning (DDRL), to mitigate spurious signals. Concretely, DDRL first applies a frequency-based sampling strategy to exclude ambiguous samples while maintaining a balanced set of positive and negative examples. It then adopts a debiased advantage estimation with fixed advantages, removing the bias introduced by group-relative policy optimization. Finally, DDRL incorporates a consensus-based off-policy refinement stage, which leverages the rejection-sampled dataset to enable efficient and stable model updates. Experiments on three large language models across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that DDRL consistently outperforms existing TTRL baselines. The code will soon be released at https://github.com/yuyongcan/DDRL.

强化学习数学推理去偏大模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。