短短对话就能改变人的道德判断，且效果持续两周。
Brief chatbot interactions produce lasting changes in human moral values
- 让聊天机器人引导讨论，观察道德判断变化
- 对话后道德标准显著改变，效应强度随时间增强
- 人未察觉被影响，适合研究人机互动与伦理风险
道德判断是人类社会行为与制度的基础。随着人工智能聊天机器人日益充当个人顾问，其对道德判断的影响却仍不明。本研究采用自然主义的组内设计，53名参与者先评估道德情境，随后与一个被引导改变道德判断的聊天机器人讨论4个场景，另与控制组机器人讨论4个场景。短暂对话即引发显著方向性变化：既接受更严格标准，也主张更大宽恕（p < 0.05；Cohen's d = 0.735–1.576），且在两周随访中效应持续增强（Cohen's d = 1.038–2.069）。对照组无变化，且影响不波及惩罚判断；两组机器人在可信赖性和吸引力上评分相当，表明个体易受未察觉、持久的道德价值操控。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Moral judgements form the foundation of human social behavior and societal systems. While Artificial Intelligence chatbots increasingly serve as personal advisors, their influence on moral judgments remains largely unexplored. Here, we examined whether directive AI conversations shift moral evaluations using a within-subject naturalistic paradigm. Fifty-three participants rated moral scenarios, then discussed four with a chatbot prompted to shift moral judgments and four with a control agent. The brief conversations induced significant directional shifts in moral judgments, accepting stricter standards as well as advocating greater leniency (ps < 0.05; Cohen's d = 0.735-1.576), with increasing strengths of this effect during a two-week follow-up (Cohen's d = 1.038-2.069). Critically, the control condition produced no changes, and the effects did not extend to punishment while participants remained unaware of the persuasive intent, and both agents were rated equally likable and convincing, suggesting a vulnerability to undetected and lasting manipulation of foundational moral values.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。