arXiv:2604.23528cs.LG2026-04被引 2

PINN训练常陷入错误解,新方法通过自适应时间步避开假解。

When PINNs Go Wrong: Pseudo-Time Stepping Against Spurious Solutions

论文配图:When PINNs Go Wrong: Pseudo-Time Stepping Against Spurious Solutions
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用自适应时间步与采样点重采样,识别并规避虚假解。
  • 在多个PDE基准上提升精度与鲁棒性,避免依赖人工调参。
  • 适合追求高可靠性物理信息学习的研究者使用。

物理信息神经网络(PINNs)为求解偏微分方程提供了有前景的机器学习框架,但在复杂问题上训练常失败,即使残差损失很小,仍可能收敛到物理上不正确的解。我们认为,这种失败并非单纯的优化困难,而是源于经验型PDE残差损失本身允许平凡或虚假解的存在。基于此,我们重新审视伪时间步进法,发现其主要优势不仅在于缓解优化难度,更在于结合列点重采样可揭示并避免虚假解。同时发现,伪时间步进的有效性高度依赖步长选择,而该参数无法仅从训练损失可靠确定。为此,我们提出一种自适应伪时间步进策略,通过局部残差雅可比的有限差分代理自动选取最大稳定步长,无需针对每题调参。在多种典型PDE基准测试中,该方法持续提升精度与鲁棒性。这些发现深化了对PINN失败机制的理解,并指明了更可靠的物理信息学习路径。所有代码与数据见:https://github.com/sifanexisted/jaxpi2。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a promising machine learning framework for solving partial differential equations, but their training often breaks down on challenging problems, sometimes converging to physically incorrect solutions despite achieving small residual losses. This failure, we argue, is not merely an optimization difficulty. Rather, it reflects a fundamental weakness of the empirical PDE residual loss, which can admit trivial or spurious solutions during training. From this perspective, we revisit pseudo-time stepping, a technique that has recently shown strong empirical success in PINNs. We show that its main benefit is not simply to ease optimization; instead, when combined with collocation-point resampling, it helps reveal and avoid spurious solutions. At the same time, we find that the effectiveness of pseudo-time stepping depends critically on the choice of step size, which cannot be tuned reliably from the training loss alone. To overcome this limitation, we propose an adaptive pseudo-time stepping strategy that selects the step size from a finite-difference surrogate of the local residual Jacobian, yielding the largest step permitted by local stability without per-problem tuning. Across a diverse set of PDE benchmarks, the proposed method consistently improves both accuracy and robustness. Together, these findings provide a clearer understanding of why PINNs fail and suggest a practical pathway toward more reliable physics-informed learning. All code and data accompanying this manuscript are available at https://github.com/sifanexisted/jaxpi2.

PINNPDE求解神经网络稳定性

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。