用机器验证证明智能系统治理结构的可靠性与必要性
Mechanized Foundations of Structural Governance: Machine-Checked Proofs for Governed Intelligence
- 通过共归纳逻辑形式化治理安全,支持无限行为分析
- 证明四大基本操作足以表达任意智能系统,且治理可递归传递
- 将抽象模型与实际运行时结合,经七万条指令测试无错误
本文提出认知工作流系统结构治理理论的五项成果。三项在 Coq 8.19 中机械化证明,使用 Interaction Trees 库与参数化共归纳;两项为纸面证明并给出显式归约。共归纳安全谓词(gov_safe)是一个共归纳性质,捕获无限程序行为下的治理安全,其布尔权限标志在未受控输入输出中为假,在受控解释下为真(已机械化)。治理不变性定理表明:治理在元递归层级中保持一致,第 n+1 层治理可由第 n 层定义等价还原(机械化)。充分性定理证明四个原子原语(code、reason、memory、call)在组合闭包意义下对任何离散智能系统具有表达完备性(机械化)。交替正规形提供任意机器的交替代码与效应层分解,并具收敛重写系统(纸面证明)。必要性定理通过显式归约至 Rice 定理,证明具备语义判断需求的问题必须包含架构不透明的 reason 原语(纸面证明)。第六项贡献连接抽象模型与部署运行时:通过 Coq 形式化 BEAM 运行时的信任、能力与哈希链逻辑,再以超过 70,000 条随机生成指令序列进行基于属性的测试,零差异。机械化代码共约 12,000 行,涵盖 36 个模块,454 个定理,无承认公理。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We present five results in the theory of structural governance for cognitive workflow systems. Three are mechanized in Coq 8.19 using the Interaction Trees library with parameterized coinduction; two are proved on paper with explicit reductions. The Coinductive Safety Predicate (gov_safe) is a coinductive property that captures governance safety for infinite program behaviors, indexed by a boolean permission flag that is provably false for ungoverned I/O and true for governed interpretations (mechanized). The Governance Invariance Theorem establishes that governance is uniform across the meta-recursive tower: governance at level n+1 reduces to governance at level n by definitional equality of the type (mechanized). The Sufficiency Theorem proves that four atomic primitives (code, reason, memory, call) are expressively complete for any discrete intelligent system, formalized as compositional closure of a Kleisli category (mechanized). The Alternating Normal Form provides a canonical decomposition of any machine into alternating code and effect layers, with a confluent rewriting system (paper proof). The Necessity Theorem proves via explicit reduction to Rice's theorem that an architecturally opaque component (the reason primitive) is mathematically necessary for problems requiring semantic judgment (paper proof). A sixth contribution connects the abstract model to the deployed runtime: the Verified Interpreter Specification formalizes the BEAM runtime's trust, capability, and hash chain logic in Coq, then tests the running system against this specification using property-based testing with over 70,000 randomly generated directive sequences and zero disagreements. The mechanization comprises approximately 12,000 lines across 36 modules with 454 theorems and zero admitted lemmas.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。