研究配电网公平性设计，分析不同公平标准对资源分配的影响。
Fairness for distribution network operations and planning
- 梳理配电网公平性多种度量方式及其数学复杂性
- 揭示公平性带来的效率损失（公平代价）与地区差异的关系
- 为电网规划决策提供透明可比的公平评估框架
将公平性纳入配电网络（DN）规划与运行已成为近期研究的关键目标。实现公平性的成本，即公平代价（PoF），代表为达成社会凝聚力而放弃的效率。由于地理位置差异，公平性方案旨在平衡用户间待遇。然而，公平性包含多种概念，从均等主义到基于贡献的准则，不同度量方式被用于衡量公平的资源分配，其数学复杂性从线性到非线性规划不等，影响整体适用性。因此，本文系统梳理了主要的公平性概念与度量方法，回顾这些方法如何影响利益相关方及资源配置中的内在优化问题，旨在支持配电网运营中的一致且透明的规划与决策。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The incorporation of fairness into the distribution network (DN) planning and operation has become a key goal of recent studies. The cost of implementing fairness, denominated the price of fairness (PoF), covers the efficiency that is renounced for attaining social cohesion through fair outcomes. Locational disparity makes fairness schemes emerge to level the consumers playing field. However, fairness encompasses a range of notions. From egalitarian to merit-based criteria, various metrics are implemented as a tool for measuring equitable utility distribution. These have different mathematical complexities, from linear to non-linear programming cases, which affect their overall applicability. Hence, this study compiles the overarching fairness notions and metrics, reviewing how these affect stakeholders and the inherent mathematical optimisation in resource allocation problems. The aim is to support consistent and transparent planning and decision-making within DN operations.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。