用知识图谱增强大模型,让3D打印缺陷分析更可解释、更可靠。
A Knowledge-Driven LLM-Based Decision-Support System for Explainable Defect Analysis and Mitigation Guidance in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
- 基于27类缺陷知识的层级图谱,结合大模型实现可解释诊断。
- 在真实数据上达到0.808的F1分数,优于其他配置。
- 适合制造业工程师和研究人员快速定位并解决3D打印缺陷。
本文提出一种知识驱动的决策支持系统,将结构化缺陷知识与大语言模型推理结合,用于激光粉末床熔融(LPBF)制造中的可解释缺陷分析与缓解指导。系统基于包含27种已知LPBF缺陷类型及其层级分类和因果关系的知识库构建,支持模糊自然语言查询,提供文献支持的缺陷解释及由工艺知识编码得出的成因与缓解策略。此外,基于基础模型的多模态图像评估模块,通过语义对齐评分实现描述符引导的微观缺陷图像解读。通过与通用视觉-语言模型对比、消融实验及评分者一致性分析进行评估。在文献衍生数据集上,完整配置的宏平均F1得分为0.808,优于其他三种配置;基于Cohen's kappa的评分者一致性分析显示模型输出与文献参考标签存在显著一致性。结果表明,知识图谱引导的表示能提升大模型辅助缺陷分析的一致性、可解释性与实用性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This work presents a knowledge-driven decision-support system that integrates structured defect knowledge with LLM-based reasoning to provide explainable defect diagnosis and mitigation guidance in manufacturing, using LPBF as a representative, safety-critical case study. The proposed ontology-integrated LLM-based decision support system for LPBF defect analysis and mitigation guidance is built on a knowledge base containing 27 known LPBF defect types organized into hierarchical categories and causal relationships. The developed system supports fuzzy natural language queries for systematic knowledge retrieval, literature-supported explanation of defects, and guidance on defect causes and mitigation strategies derived from encoded process knowledge. Furthermore, a multimodal image-assessment module based on foundation models enables descriptor-guided interpretation of representative microscopic defect images through semantic alignment scoring. The proposed framework was evaluated through qualitative comparisons with general-purpose vision-language models, an ablation study, and an inter-rater reliability analysis. Evaluation on the literature-derived dataset showed that the fully integrated configuration outperformed the other three evaluated system configurations, achieving a macro-average F1 score of 0.808. Additionally, inter-rater reliability analysis using Cohen's kappa indicated substantial agreement between the model outputs and the literature-derived reference labels. These findings suggest that ontology-guided knowledge representation can improve the consistency, interpretability, and practical usefulness of LLM-assisted LPBF defect analysis.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。