arXiv:2605.03383cs.AI2026-05

地质解释新模型,能自主判断难点并调用工具深入分析。

GeoDecider: An Evidence-Grounded Agent for Geological Interpretation via Deliberative Reasoning

论文配图:GeoDecider: An Evidence-Grounded Agent for Geological Interpretation via Deliberative Reasoning
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 先快速预测,再对难样本触发深度推理
  • 在4个公开数据集上准确率显著优于基线
  • 适合需要高精度解释的石油勘探场景

地质解释通过间接地球物理观测推断地下属性与构造。井下测井分类任务将测井记录按深度划分地质类别,但因不同地层可能呈现相似测井响应,且准确解释依赖局部测量、深度上下文、领域知识及层间合理过渡,极具挑战。现有自动化方法多采用固定预测流程,难以为困难样本获取额外证据。本文提出GeoDecider,一种基于证据的决断型地质解释代理。该模型首先进行高效数值预测,随后对高难度样本触发工具辅助推理。轻量级分类器生成逐点预测并依据置信度估计难度,高难度点作为路由锚点,激活区间级分析,综合邻近观测进行整体考察。每个激活区间通过专用工具构建包含地质知识、深度趋势、同井历史预测及训练井中相似案例的证据档案。三种互补科学视角生成候选解释,模型比较支持证据、解决分歧,并应用地质约束检查连续性、边界信号和测井一致性。在四个公开井下测井基准测试上,GeoDecider持续优于代表性基线,验证了选择性证据收集与反思式推理的价值。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Geological interpretation infers subsurface properties and structures from indirect geophysical observations. Well-log classification provides a measurable setting by assigning geological classes to depth-indexed petrophysical records. The task is difficult because different subsurface units may exhibit similar logging responses, whereas accurate interpretation often depends on local measurements, depth-wise context, domain knowledge, and reasonable transitions between neighboring layers. Existing automated methods mainly follow fixed prediction pipelines, leaving little room to gather additional evidence for difficult samples. In this work, we propose GeoDecider, an evidence-grounded agent for deliberative geological interpretation. GeoDecider retains efficient numerical prediction as the first stage, then selectively invokes tool-assisted reasoning for difficult intervals. A lightweight classifier produces point-wise predictions and estimates sample difficulty from its prediction scores. High-difficulty points act as routing anchors, triggering interval-level analysis so that nearby observations can be examined together. For each activated interval, specialized tools build an Evidence Profile that summarizes geological knowledge, depth-wise trends, previous predictions from the same well, and similar cases retrieved from training wells. Three complementary scientific views generate candidate interpretations. GeoDecider compares their supporting evidence, resolves disagreements, then applies geology-informed checks on continuity, boundary cues, and petrophysical consistency. Experiments on four public well-log benchmarks show that GeoDecider consistently outperforms representative baselines, demonstrating the value of selective evidence gathering and deliberative reasoning for geological interpretation.~\footnote{Our code is available at https://github.com/Xiaoyu-Tao/GeoDecider}

地质解释决策代理推理机制测井分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。