arXiv:2605.04941cs.CL2026-05ACL被引 1

用小模型+符号推理,让大模型更准地做逻辑判断。

UFAL-CUNI at SemEval-2026 Task 11: An Efficient Modular Neuro-symbolic Method for Syllogistic Reasoning

论文配图:UFAL-CUNI at SemEval-2026 Task 11: An Efficient Modular Neuro-symbolic Method for Syllogistic Reasoning
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用小语言模型解析自然语言为一阶逻辑,再交由符号证明器处理。
  • 在多数子任务上准确率高,且内容干扰小,表现优于同类零样本模型。
  • 适合研究逻辑推理与大模型偏见的学者,尤其关注可解释性者。

本文介绍我们提交至SemEval-2026 Task 11:解耦大语言模型中的内容与形式推理的系统。提出一种高效的模块化神经符号方法,结合符号证明器与小型推理型语言模型(40亿参数)。系统包含基于LLM的解析器,将自然语言三段论转换为一阶逻辑(FOL)表示,搭配自动定理证明器,并有两个可选模块:用于多语言输入的机器翻译,以及用于识别相关前提的符号检索组件。系统在多数子任务上达到有竞争力的准确率,且内容干扰较小。消融实验表明,该方法在该参数规模下优于基于LLM的零样本基线,但小型LLM的多语言能力有限。最后,我们讨论了任务主要评估指标并分析其局限性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This paper describes our system submitted to SemEval-2026 Task 11: Disentangling Content and Formal Reasoning in Large Language Models. We present an efficient modular neuro-symbolic approach, combining a symbolic prover with small reasoning LLMs (4B parameters). The system consists of an LLM-based parser that translates natural language syllogisms to a first-order logic (FOL) representation, an automated theorem prover, and two optional modules: machine translation for multilingual inputs and a symbolic retrieval component for the identification of relevant premises. The system achieves competitive accuracy and relatively low content effect on most subtasks. Our ablations show that this approach outperforms LLM-based zero-shot baselines in this parameter size range, but also reveal limited multilingual capabilities of small LLMs. Finally, we include a discussion of the task's main ranking metric and analyze its limitations.

逻辑推理神经符号小模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。