arXiv:2605.07389cs.SEcs.LG2026-05

剖析芯片行业ML工程团队协作痛点,揭示角色模糊等核心挑战。

Exploring CoCo Challenges in ML Engineering Teams: Insights From the Semiconductor Industry

  • 通过12名从业者访谈,挖掘硬件驱动下ML团队的协作困境
  • 发现16项常见挑战,角色不清为最严重问题
  • 适合芯片、制造等领域从事ML落地的工程师参考

机器学习(ML)融入复杂软件系统,加剧了开发团队间的协作与沟通(CoCo)难题。ML工程(MLE)团队常包含不同角色:工程师、数据科学家、软件工程师及领域专家,各具目标、经验与术语体系,导致系统部署、复现与长期维护困难。以往研究多聚焦软件主导企业,对硬件主导场景的实证理解不足。在硬件主导环境中,严格的数据治理、漫长的开发周期及与物理过程的高度耦合,进一步放大协调复杂性并降低灵活性。本研究通过对一家全球半导体公司中的MLE团队进行质性调研,采访12位从业者,探讨其协作实践、工具使用、挑战与应对策略。分析识别出16项反复出现的挑战,其中角色与责任不明确最为突出。研究还归纳出被实践者认为有效的常见做法与建议。尽管基于单一组织背景,结果与跨学科ML系统开发中已知问题一致,也揭示了硬件约束下挑战的独特表现形式。研究指明未来需加强协作支持工具与研究方向,以保障ML系统在复杂工程环境中的成功实施。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The integration of machine learning (ML) into complex software systems has increased challenges in collaboration and communication (CoCo) of the teams building these systems. ML engineering (MLE) teams often involve diverse roles, ML engineers, data scientists, software engineers, and domain experts, each bringing unique goals, experiences, and jargon. These interdisciplinary dynamics can make it challenging to deploy, reproduce, and maintain ML-enabled systems over the long term. Previous studies have uncovered several CoCo challenges and practices, but most have focused on software-centric companies, leaving limited empirical understanding of how these dynamics unfold in hardware-centric contexts. In hardware-centric environments, CoCo challenges are shaped by additional constraints such as strict data governance, long development cycles, and tight coupling with physical processes, which amplify coordination complexity and reduce flexibility. To strengthen empirical understanding in such settings, we present a qualitative investigation of MLE teams within a global semiconductor company, where ML-enabled systems and manufacturing processes introduce additional complexity. We interviewed 12 practitioners regarding CoCo practices, tools, challenges, and approaches. Through analysis, we identified 16 recurring challenges, with unclear roles and responsibilities emerging as the most critical, and common practices and recommendations practitioners considered effective in mitigating CoCo problems. While grounded in a single organizational context, our findings align with known issues in interdisciplinary ML-enabled systems development, but also demonstrate how these challenges manifest differently under hardware-driven constraints. Our results highlight directions for future research and tool support to strengthen CoCo in MLE projects and ensure the success of ML-enabled systems.

ML工程团队协作芯片制造

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。