arXiv:2605.09089cs.CVcs.AI2026-05

针对身份证伪造,提出局部定位检测方法,提升识别精度并降低资源消耗。

Field-Localized Forgery Detection for Digital Identity Documents

论文配图:Field-Localized Forgery Detection for Digital Identity Documents
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 分区域定位人脸和文字区域,针对性检测篡改
  • 在多类攻击下AUC达0.837以上,误报率降29个百分点
  • 参数量少13倍、计算量少21倍,适合移动端部署

银行、金融科技平台等第三方服务在数字开户和eKYC流程中,常通过比对上传的身份文件与自拍或实时人脸来验证用户。该流程便捷,但也易受局部篡改威胁,如替换照片、修改文本信息或两者同时篡改。现有图像伪造检测方法主要面向自然图像,未考虑身份文件中关键信息集中于特定语义区域的结构特性。本文提出FLiD,一种轻量级的字段局部化伪造检测框架。不处理整张文档,而是用微调后的YOLO11定位人脸与文本区域,采用冻结的MobileNetV3-Small提取紧凑特征,再通过仅191K参数的小型分类头进行字段级伪造判断。人脸与文本检测器独立训练,通过得分融合处理同时篡改情况。在5折交叉验证下,FLiD在人脸、文本及联合攻击上的AUC分别为0.834、0.926和0.837,等错误率相比全图基线降低28–29个百分点。其性能优于通用伪造检测器,同时每字段所需可训练参数减少13倍,浮点运算量减少21倍(整文档约减少8倍),是资源受限KYC场景下的理想选择。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Digital onboarding and eKYC systems used by banks, fintech platforms, telecom providers, and other third-party services commonly verify users by comparing an uploaded identity document with a selfie or live facial capture. This workflow is convenient, but it also makes verification systems vulnerable to localised document manipulations, such as replacing the facial photograph, editing textual identity fields, or altering both. Existing image-forgery detectors are largely designed for natural images and do not explicitly account for the structured layout of identity documents, where security-relevant information is concentrated in specific semantic fields. We propose FLiD, a lightweight field-localised framework for identity-document forgery detection. Instead of processing the full document image, FLiD localises the facial and textual regions using a fine-tuned YOLO11 detector, extracts compact representations with a frozen MobileNetV3-Small backbone, and classifies field-level forgeries using a small 191K-parameter head. Face and text detectors are trained independently and combined through score-level fusion for documents containing simultaneous manipulations. Under 5-fold cross-validation, FLiD achieves AUC scores of 0.834, 0.926, and 0.837 for face, text, and combined attacks, respectively, while reducing Equal Error Rate by 28--29 percentage points compared with a full-document baseline. FLiD also outperforms general-purpose forgery detectors while requiring 13x fewer trainable parameters and 21x fewer FLOPs per field (~8x per full multi-field document), making it a promising candidate for data and resource constrained KYC deployment.

伪造检测身份验证轻量化模型字段定位

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。