用多轮反驳机制提升视觉异常检测的准确性与泛化能力
AnomalyClaw: A Universal Visual Anomaly Detection Agent via Tool-Grounded Refutation

- 将异常判断转化为多轮工具辅助的反驳过程,逐条验证候选异常
- 在12个数据集上相比单次推理提升3.5%至7.9%的宏AUROC
- 无需标注即可自进化,适合跨领域工业与医疗异常检测场景
视觉异常检测(VAD)在工业质检、医学影像、基础设施监控和遥感等领域至关重要。然而,不同领域间异常定义、数据模态和标注标准差异大,导致单一领域训练的模型难以迁移。预训练的视觉语言模型(VLM)虽具备跨域感知能力,但单次推理结果不可靠,过度依赖先验知识而非正常样本参考或细粒度特征证据。为此,我们提出AnomalyClaw——一种无需训练的通用视觉异常检测代理,将异常判断转化为多轮工具驱动的反驳过程。每轮中,代理提出候选异常,并借助13种工具进行视觉验证、参考解析与冻结专家探查。在包含12个数据集的CrossDomainVAD-12基准上,AnomalyClaw相较单步直接推理实现显著提升:GPT-5.5 +6.23 pp,Seed2.0-lite +7.93 pp,Qwen3.5-VL-27B +3.52 pp。我们进一步引入可选的语义化自演化扩展,通过内部分歧构建在线规则库,无需人工标签,在Qwen3.5-VL-27B上获得+2.09 pp平均增益,接近使用K=10真值标签的监督基线(+1.99 pp)。结果表明,代理式反驳提升了VLM对异常的理解与推理能力,而不仅是工具输出的简单聚合。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Visual anomaly detection (VAD) is crucial in many real-world fields, such as industrial inspection, medical imaging, infrastructure monitoring, and remote sensing. However, the specific anomaly definitions, data modalities, and annotation standards across different domains make it difficult to transfer single-domain trained VAD models. Vision-language models (VLMs), pre-trained on large-scale cross-domain data, can perform visual perception under task instructions, offering a promising solution for cross-domain VAD. However, single-inference VLM judgments are unreliable, since they rely more on prior knowledge than on normal-sample references or fine-grained feature evidence. We therefore present AnomalyClaw, a training-free VAD agent that turns anomaly judgment into a multi-round refutation process. In each round, the agent proposes candidate anomalies and refutes each against normal-sample references, drawing on a 13-tool library for visual verification, reference parsing, and frozen expert probing. On the CrossDomainVAD-12 benchmark (12 datasets), AnomalyClaw achieves consistent macro-AUROC improvements over single-step direct inference with +6.23 pp on GPT-5.5, +7.93 pp on Seed2.0-lite, and +3.52 pp on Qwen3.5-VL-27B. We further introduce an optional verbalized self-evolution extension. It builds an online rulebook from internal-branch disagreement without oracle labels. On Qwen3.5-VL-27B, it delivers a +2.09 pp mean gain, comparable to a K = 10 oracle-label supervised baseline (+1.99 pp). These results show that agentic refutation improve anomaly understanding and reasoning of VLMs, rather than merely aggregating tool outputs.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。