arXiv:2605.10714cs.CLcs.AI2026-05中稿 · BigPicture Worksho…

低资源语言NLP需结合跨语言迁移与本地数据建设,才能有效提升性能。

Why Low-Resource NLP Needs More Than Cross-Lingual Transfer: Lessons Learned from Luxembourgish

论文配图:Why Low-Resource NLP Needs More Than Cross-Lingual Transfer: Lessons Learned from Luxembourgish
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 跨语言迁移依赖高质量目标语言数据才能发挥效果。
  • 本地数据不足时,单独使用无法达到理想性能。
  • 两者互补是可持续低资源NLP的关键路径。

跨语言迁移已成为扩展自然语言处理技术至低资源语言的核心范式。通过利用高资源语言的标注数据,多语言模型可在极少或无目标语言标注数据的情况下实现良好任务表现。然而,跨语言迁移在多大程度上可替代语言特定工作仍不明确。本文综合分析了卢森堡语的研究成果与数据收集情况,该语言虽在语言类型上接近高资源语言,并存在于多语言环境中,但在现代NLP技术中仍代表性不足。研究发现,跨语言迁移与语言特定努力存在根本性相互依赖关系:前者可显著提升目标语言性能,但其成功高度依赖足够高质量、任务对齐的目标语言数据;而后者在低资源环境下通常规模过小,难以独立支撑强性能。因此,仅当本地资源被整合进跨语言框架时,其潜力才能充分发挥。我们主张二者不应视为竞争选项,而应作为可持续低资源NLP流程中的互补环节。基于此,提出集成与平衡跨语言迁移与语言特定开发的实用指南。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Cross-lingual transfer has become a central paradigm for extending natural language processing (NLP) technologies to low-resource languages. By leveraging supervision from high-resource languages, multilingual language models can achieve strong task performance with little or no labeled target-language data. However, it remains unclear to what extent cross-lingual transfer can substitute for language-specific efforts. In this paper, we synthesize prior research findings and data collection results on Luxembourgish, which, despite its typological proximity to high-resource languages and its presence in a multilingual context, remains insufficiently represented in modern NLP technologies. Across findings, we observe a fundamental interdependence between cross-lingual transfer and language-specific efforts. Cross-lingual transfer can substantially improve target-language performance, but its success depends critically on the availability of sufficiently high-quality, task-aligned target-language data. At the same time, such resources, particularly in low-resource settings, are typically too limited in scale to drive strong performance on their own. Instead, such resources reach their full potential only when leveraged within a cross-lingual framework. We therefore argue that cross-lingual transfer and language-specific efforts should not be viewed as competing alternatives. Instead, they function as complementary components of a sustainable low-resource NLP pipeline. Based on these insights, we provide practical guidelines for integrating and balancing cross-lingual transfer with language-specific development in sustainable low-resource NLP pipelines.

低资源语言跨语言迁移数据建设

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。