arXiv:2605.11360cs.CRcs.AI2026-05被引 3

用风险层级自动授权,让用户只在必要时做决定。

Options, Not Clicks: Lattice Refinement for Consent-Driven MCP Authorization

论文配图:Options, Not Clicks: Lattice Refinement for Consent-Driven MCP Authorization
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 基于风险层级自动允许安全调用,仅对高危操作提请确认。
  • 实测98.2%准确率,99.4%风险升级被捕捉,验证开销仅8.2毫秒。
  • 用户测试中更受青睐,信任感提升且减少重复确认。

随着模型上下文协议(MCP)的普及,通过有意义的用户许可来保障工具调用的安全性成为关键挑战。现有方法要么采用宽泛的开关控制,要么依赖不透明的LLM决策,无法识别危险参数,常导致许可疲劳。本文提出Conleash,一种客户端中间件,通过风险层级实现边界范围内的授权:自动允许已知安全调用,对高风险操作进行升级;配备用户自定义不变量的策略引擎,以及将用户决策转化为可复用规则的精炼循环。在984个真实调用轨迹上评估显示,Conleash准确率达98.2%,捕获99.4%的高风险升级,策略验证额外开销仅为8.2毫秒;用户研究(N=16)表明,参与者显著偏好其细粒度权限管理,认为更可信、提示更少。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

As Model Context Protocol adoption grows, securing tool invocations via meaningful user consent has become a critical challenge, as existing methods, broad always allow toggles or opaque LLM-based decisions, fail to account for dangerous call arguments and often lead to consent fatigue. In this work, we present Conleash, a client-side middleware that enforces boundary-scoped authorization by utilizing a risk lattice to auto-permit safe calls within known boundaries while escalating risks, a policy engine for user-defined invariants, and a refinement loop that converts user decisions into reusable rules. Evaluated on 984 real-world traces, Conleash achieved 98.2% accuracy, caught 99.4% of escalations, and added only 8.2 ms of overhead for policy verification; furthermore, in a user study where N=16, participants significantly preferred Conleash scoped permissions over traditional methods, citing higher trust and reduced prompting.

权限控制用户授权MCP安全机制

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。