arXiv:2605.11687cs.AI2026-05

让金融AI解释可留存、多方法比对并支持对话查询,提升可信度。

Persistent and Conversational Multi-Method Explainability for Trustworthy Financial AI

  • 将解释结果存为带元数据的持久化对象,支持检索与故障恢复
  • 通过对话助手对比多方法解释,提升结果鲁棒性评估能力
  • 约束提示词使幻觉率降36%,方法引用率升73%,适合金融监管场景

金融机构日益需要持久、跨方法验证且可对话访问的AI解释。本文提出面向金融情感分析的人中心可解释AI架构,包含三项贡献:首先,将LIME特征归因、遮挡词重要性评分和显著性热图等XAI成果作为分布式存储中的持久化对象,配备结构化元数据与自然语言摘要,支持解释历史的语义检索及系统故障后的自动索引重建;其次,实现多方法解释三角验证,通过检索增强生成(RAG)助手对比同一预测下多种XAI方法的结果,支持用户以自然语言对话评估解释一致性;第三,通过自动化检查验证生成解释的忠实性,包括依据完整性、幻觉声明和方法归属行为。我们在使用FinBERT预测的EXTRA-BRAIN金融情感分析流水线中验证该架构,结果表明:约束提示相比朴素提示使幻觉率降低36%,方法归属引用率提高73%。研究对受监管金融环境中可信人机协同AI服务具有启示意义。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Financial institutions increasingly require AI explanations that are persistent, cross-validated across methods, and conversationally accessible to human decision-makers. We present an architecture for human-centered explainable AI in financial sentiment analysis that combines three contributions. First, we treat XAI artifacts -- LIME feature attributions, occlusion-based word importance scores, and saliency heatmaps -- as persistent, searchable objects in distributed S3-compatible storage with structured metadata and natural-language summaries, enabling semantic retrieval over explanation history and automatic index reconstruction after system failures. Second, we enable multi-method explanation triangulation, where a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) assistant compares and synthesizes results from multiple XAI methods applied to the same prediction, allowing users to assess explanation robustness through natural-language dialogue. Third, we evaluate the faithfulness of generated explanations using automated checks over grounding completeness, hallucinated claims, and method-attribution behavior. We demonstrate the architecture on an EXTRA-BRAIN financial sentiment analysis pipeline using FinBERT predictions and present evaluation results showing that constrained prompting reduces hallucination rate by 36\% and increases method-attribution citations by 73\% compared to naive prompting. We discuss implications for trustworthy, human-centered AI services in regulated financial environments.

可解释AI金融AI对话系统多方法验证

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。