用图神经网络和物理注意力机制,快速准确预测汽车碰撞时的形变过程。
Crash Assessment via Mesh-Based Graph Neural Networks and Physics-Aware Attention

- 融合网格消息传递与几何感知注意力,构建混合模型预测碰撞形变。
- 最佳模型在25个样本上均方根误差达3.20毫米,保持形变场物理合理性。
- 适合需要快速评估碰撞安全性的工业设计工程师使用。
全车碰撞仿真计算成本高,限制了其在迭代设计中的应用。本文研究了三种学习型混合代理模型(MeshTransolver、MeshGeoTransolver 和 MeshGeoFLARE),用于预测工业级侧向杆碰撞基准下的时间分辨结构形变场。评估神经代理模型是否能以足够精度、空间规律性和结构合理性重现完整场碰撞动力学,以支持工程分析。所提架构结合局部网格消息传递、几何感知全局注意力及稀疏接触感知修正,实现自回归碰撞滚动。在相同训练与超参数配置下比较基于网格的图神经网络、基于注意力的几何模型及混合架构。混合模型同时捕捉短程结构相互作用与长程变形模式;稀疏接触感知变体评估滚动过程中动态邻近交互的影响。在25个样本的全车测试集上,最优混合模型达到3.20毫米的时间均方根误差。尽管几何感知注意力基线在定量指标上具有竞争力,但定性侧视检查显示其可能引入局部空间噪声和形变不规则,影响结构解读。相比之下,混合网格-注意力模型在标量精度、生存空间一致性与物理可解释形变场之间取得最佳平衡。结果表明,碰撞代理评估应结合全局误差指标与下游安全相关量及定性场检查。该方法实现快速全场预测,同时保留工业碰撞工程分析所需的关键结构信息。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Full-vehicle crash simulations are computationally expensive, limiting their use in iterative design exploration. This work investigates learned hybrid surrogate models (MeshTransolver, MeshGeoTransolver, and MeshGeoFLARE) for predicting time-resolved structural deformation fields in an industrial lateral pole-impact benchmark. We evaluate whether neural surrogates can reproduce full-field crash kinematics with sufficient accuracy, spatial regularity, and structural plausibility for engineering interpretation. The proposed architectures combine local mesh message passing, geometry-aware global attention, and sparse contact-aware correction for autoregressive crash rollout. We compare mesh-based graph neural networks, attention-based geometric models, and hybrid architectures under a common training and hyperparameter configuration. The hybrid models capture both short-range structural interactions and long-range deformation patterns, while a sparse contact-aware variant assesses the effect of dynamic proximity interactions during rollout. On a 25-sample full-vehicle test set, the best hybrid model achieves a temporal mean root-mean-square error of 3.20 mm. While geometry-aware attention baselines are quantitatively competitive, qualitative side-view inspection shows they can introduce local spatial noise and deformation irregularities that complicate structural interpretation. In contrast, hybrid mesh-attention models provide the best balance between scalar accuracy, survival-space consistency, and physically interpretable displacement fields. These results suggest that crash surrogate assessment should combine global error metrics with downstream safety-relevant quantities and qualitative field inspection. The proposed methodology enables fast full-field predictions while preserving essential structural information for industrial crash-engineering analysis.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。