对比两种控制方法，发现传感器驱动更抗干扰，模型驱动更快响应。

Fully actuated multirotor platforms decouple translational force generation from vehicle attitude, enabling independent control of position and orientation and shifting performance limitations from attitude authority to actuator dynamics and control effectiveness. This paper compares a model-based nonlinear dynamic inversion controller (geometric NDI) with a sensor-based incremental dynamic inversion controller (INDI) on a fixed-tilt fully actuated hexarotor. Both controllers share an identical outer-loop structure and are both executed at 500 Hz; therefore, performance differences can be attributed primarily to the inversion strategy. Controller performance is evaluated in five experiments covering attitude step tracking under nominal conditions and under a 50% mismatch in the rotor force coefficient, hover disturbance rejection under an external lateral load, waypoint tracking in the presence of wind gust disturbances, reduced control frequency, and injected sensor degradation. The results show that INDI offers clear advantages under parameter mismatch, gust disturbances, and sensor degradation, and maintains lower position errors across the controller-frequency sweep. However, its advantages are not universal: geometric NDI yields better attitude tracking at reduced control frequencies. To the authors' best knowledge, this work presents the first experimental validation of a full pose tracking INDI controller with decoupled translational and rotational dynamics. These findings highlight the trade-off between measurement-based and model-based inversion for robust control and rapid deployment of fully actuated UAVs.