提出新方法解决惯性导航中未知时延导致的定位误差问题。
Galilean State Estimation for Inertial Navigation Systems with Unknown Time Delay

- 利用伽利略对称性构建时空联合表示,统一建模导航状态与时间延迟。
- 在90毫秒和120毫秒时延下测试,定位精度优于现有方法。
- 适合高精度无人机导航、车载系统等对时延敏感的应用场景。
许多惯性导航系统(INS)依赖全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)位置作为主要测量值以驱动滤波性能并控制误差增长。然而,商用级GNSS接收机引入的测量延迟在50毫秒至300毫秒之间,具体取决于传感器质量和工作模式。若未显式补偿,此类时延会显著降低INS性能。现有算法通常离线估计时延,使用缓冲的惯性测量单元(IMU)数据并行运行滤波器,并通过IMU预积分向前推算当前状态。最先进在线方法是将时延作为状态参数建模的扩展卡尔曼滤波器(EKF),定义预积分时长。本文提出一种新颖的几何框架,利用伽利略对称性为时延导航系统提供时空一致的状态表示。由此导出的等变滤波器(EqF)可联合估计导航状态与时间延迟。在两架固定翼无人机上进行验证,其GNSS时延分别为90毫秒和120毫秒,飞行时间2至3分钟。仿真进一步考察长达500毫秒的时延,并与最先进的EKF进行统计对比。结果表明,EqF保持了精度与一致性,而EKF缺乏一致性且性能随时延增加显著下降。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Many Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) use Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) position as the primary measurement to drive filter performance and bound error growth. However, commercial-grade GNSS receivers introduce unknown measurement delays ranging from 50 ms to 300 ms depending on sensor quality and operating mode. Such time delays can significantly degrade INS performance unless they are explicitly compensated for. Existing algorithms commonly estimate this delay offline, run the filter concurrently with GNSS measurements using buffered Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data, and predict the current state by forward-integrating buffered inertial measurements via IMU preintegration. The state-of-the-art online method is an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) that explicitly models the time delay as a state parameter, which defines the preintegration duration. This paper introduces a novel geometric framework for modeling time-delayed INS, in which Galilean symmetry is leveraged to provide a joint representation of space and time for consistent state estimation. An Equivariant Filter (EqF) is derived for the coupled estimation of navigation states and time delay. Validation is performed on two fixed-wing Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAV) with GNSS time lags of 90 ms and 120 ms. The test flights last two to three minutes. Simulations further investigate delays up to 500 ms and provide a statistical comparison against the state-of-the-art EKF. Results show that the EqF preserves accuracy and consistency, while the EKF lacks consistency and its performance degrades significantly with increasing measurement delays.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。