arXiv:2605.13311cs.AIcs.IR2026-05

用知识图谱整合多种创新方法,自动发现高可信度专利创意。

IdeaForge: A Knowledge Graph-Grounded Multi-Agent Framework for Cross-Methodology Innovation Analysis and Patent Claim Generation

  • 多智能体协同,跨方法论结构化记录创新思路。
  • 通过图谱关联多方法支持的专利主张,提升创意可信度。
  • 适合需要可追溯、可验证专利生成的科研与企业创新团队。

当前AI辅助创新系统多采用单一创新方法(如TRIZ或设计思维),通过顺序提示流程生成创意,但无法保留中间推理结构,导致跨方法洞察碎片化,影响可追溯性、综合能力与新颖性评估。我们提出IdeaForge,一种基于知识图谱的多智能体框架,用于创新分析与专利主张生成。该框架集成TRIZ、Design Thinking和SCAMPER等多种方法论,由专家智能体在持久的FalkorDB知识图谱上操作,分别构建矛盾、发明原理、用户需求、转换关系、类比及候选主张等结构化实体与关系。核心贡献在于基于图谱的跨方法汇聚机制:独立被多方法支持的主张通过CONVERGENT关系连接,实现高置信度创新候选的识别。下游专利起草智能体基于汇聚子图生成结构化专利草案,降低对无约束语言模型生成的依赖。引入InnovationScore公式,综合评估主张的汇聚支持度、方法多样性、主张强度与现有技术挑战数。我们阐述了图谱模式、智能体架构、汇聚检测流程与专利合成工作流。在法律科技场景的实验表明,图谱驱动的多方法合成相比单方法基线,产生更多样且可追溯的创新候选。研究对计算创造力、可解释的AI辅助发明及图原生创新系统具有启示意义。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Current AI-assisted innovation systems typically apply a single ideation methodology (such as TRIZ or Design Thinking) using sequential prompt-based workflows that do not preserve intermediate reasoning structure. As a result, insights generated across methodologies remain fragmented, limiting traceability, synthesis, and systematic evaluation of novelty. We present IdeaForge, a knowledge graph-grounded multi-agent framework for innovation analysis and patent claim generation. IdeaForge integrates multiple innovation methodologies (TRIZ, Design Thinking, and SCAMPER) through specialist agents operating over a persistent FalkorDB knowledge graph. Each agent contributes structured entities and relationships representing contradictions, inventive principles, user needs, transformations, analogies, and candidate claims. The central contribution of IdeaForge is a cross-methodology convergence mechanism implemented through graph-based claim linkage. Claims independently supported by multiple methodologies are connected using CONVERGENT relationships, enabling identification of high-confidence innovation candidates through graph traversal. A downstream patent drafting agent generates structured patent drafts grounded in convergent claim subgraphs, reducing reliance on unconstrained language model generation. An InnovationScore formula ranks claims by convergent support, methodology diversity, claim strength, and prior art challenge count. We describe the graph schema, agent architecture, convergence detection pipeline, and patent synthesis workflow. Experiments on a legal technology use case demonstrate that graph-grounded multi-methodology synthesis produces more diverse and traceable innovation candidates compared to single-methodology baselines. We discuss implications for computational creativity, explainable AI-assisted invention, and graph-native innovation systems.

创新生成知识图谱多智能体专利生成

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。