让推荐系统动态理解地点在不同情境下的用途,提升精准度。
Agent4POI: Agentic Context-Conditioned Affordance Reasoning for Multimodal Point-of-Interest Recommendation

- 用大模型生成随情境变化的动态推荐表示,而非固定嵌入
- 在三个数据集上相对最强基线提升23.2%,冷启动场景性能超基线2.4倍
- 适合需要理解地点多重用途的智能推荐场景
我们提出Agent4POI,首个在推荐时生成情境依赖的多模态表示的地点推荐框架,而非依赖与情境无关的静态地点嵌入。现有方法为每个地点计算一次静态嵌入,无法推理同一咖啡馆为何周一适合独处工作、周五晚上适合聚会庆祝。我们形式化证明:在标准双线性打分下,任何预计算编码器都无法满足情境敏感排序,因此需在推理时生成物品端表示。Agent4POI反向计算:给定情境上下文,四阶段语言模型代理生成动态、情境特定的可用性查询(第1阶段),并在图像、评论和元数据证据上执行五步跨模态思维链(第2阶段)。结果得到基于吉布森可用性理论的不确定性感知可用性表示。这些跨模态判断形成结构化、不确定性调整的可用性表示(第3阶段),并通过语义缓存系统对齐用户偏好以实现低延迟排序(第4阶段)。在三个地点推荐基准和三种评估设置(标准、冷启动、情境迁移)下,Agent4POI相较最强基线相对提升23.2%,情境迁移下仅下降7.5%(强基线下降16–17%)。在冷启动场景中,其性能优于最佳内容基线达2.4倍,而基于ID的方法无法泛化。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We introduce Agent4POI, the first POI recommendation framework that generates context-conditioned multimodal representations at recommendation time, rather than relying on static POI embeddings pre-computed independently of context. Existing multimodal systems encode each POI once as a static embedding, a design that precludes reasoning about why the same cafe affords solo work on Monday but group celebration on Friday evening. We formally prove that no pre-computed encoder can satisfy context-sensitive ranking under standard bilinear scoring, motivating inference-time item-side representation. Agent4POI inverts this computation: given a situational context, a four-phase LLM agent generates dynamic, context-specific affordance queries (Phase 1) and executes a five-step cross-modal chain-of-thought over image, review, and metadata evidence (Phase 2). The resulting uncertainty-aware affordance representation is grounded in Gibsonian affordance theory. These cross-modal verdicts form a structured, uncertainty-adjusted affordance representation (Phase 3), which is aligned with user preferences via a semantic caching system for low-latency ranking (Phase 4). On three POI benchmarks and three evaluation configurations (standard, cold-start, context-shift), Agent4POI achieves a 23.2% relative gain over the strongest baseline and degrades by only 7.5% under context-shift versus 16--17\% for the strongest baselines. In cold-start scenarios, Agent4POI outperforms the best content-based baseline by up to 2.4x, whereas ID-based methods fail to generalize.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。