arXiv:2605.16294cs.CYcs.AI2026-05

AI正让科研人员从创造者转为把关人,引发学术所有权危机。

Are Researchers Being Replaced by Artificial Intelligence?

  • AI生成假说、论文与评审,科研角色从创造转向筛选。
  • 1600名科学家调查显示担忧与期待并存,但责任未变。
  • 核心风险是人类失去对科学本质的理解,而非AI无法做研究。

2023年《自然》杂志的一项针对1600名科研人员的调查显示,科学家们对人工智能工具在研究中日益广泛的应用既感到担忧,又充满期待。这一矛盾情绪构成了本文的核心问题:研究人员是否正在被人工智能取代?我们主张,这种取代并非消失,而是从‘研究者作为创造者’转变为‘研究者作为把关者’。随着AI代理越来越多地生成假设、论文和评审意见,人类虽仍承担责任,却可能失去对知识的真正掌控权。本文探讨了人工智能如何重塑科研生命周期,并揭示了更深层的危险:不是人工智能无法进行科学研究,而是人类可能逐渐不再真正理解科学本身。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

A Nature survey from 2023 involving 1,600 researchers shows that scientists are ``concerned, as well as excited, by the increasing use of artificial-intelligence tools in research.'' This tension frames our central question: Are researchers being replaced by artificial intelligence? We argue that replacement is already underway-not as disappearance, but as a shift from researcher-as-creator to researcher-as-curator. As AI agents increasingly generate hypotheses, papers, and reviews, humans risk retaining responsibility while losing intellectual ownership. This article examines how AI is reshaping the scientific lifecycle and exposes the deeper danger: not that AI will fail to do science, but that humans may stop truly understanding it.

AI科研学术伦理认知异化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。