arXiv:2605.17000cs.LGcs.AI2026-05被引 1

首个面向大模型优化的开源基准,让黑箱优化研究更易落地。

BoLT: A Benchmark to Democratize Black-box Optimization Research for Expensive LLM Tasks

论文配图:BoLT: A Benchmark to Democratize Black-box Optimization Research for Expensive LLM Tasks
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 构建基于真实大模型实验数据的可复现优化基准
  • 覆盖多保真度、多目标等复杂优化场景,验证主流方法效果
  • 适合大模型调优与黑箱优化研究者使用

大模型训练与推理配置(如超参数、数据混合比例、提示词)的优化对性能至关重要,但实践中常依赖经验法则,可能导致次优结果。将此类问题建模为噪声大、代价高、无导数的黑箱优化问题,贝叶斯优化(BO)等方法具有潜力,但现有研究受限于高昂的大模型成本,多在合成函数或小规模数据集上评估,难以反映真实挑战。为此,我们提出 BoLT——首个以大模型为核心的基准,旨在推动黑箱优化研究的普及。BoLT 覆盖多保真度、多目标、异方差噪声和高维搜索空间等真实优化问题,所有任务均基于数千次真实大模型实验的数据构建,并通过轻量级代理模型实现完全可复现与访问。我们在广泛范围内对比了多种 BO 和黑箱优化方法,结果显示部分 BO 方法在各类任务中持续领先,揭示了现有方法在大模型优化中的不足,凸显了更新基准的必要性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Optimization of LLM training and inference configurations, such as hyperparameters, data mixtures, and prompts, is critical to performance, but it is often approached heuristically in practice, leading to potentially suboptimal outcomes. By framing them as noisy, expensive, and derivative-free optimization problems, Bayesian optimization (BO) and other black-box optimization (BBO) methods offer a promising yet underexplored direction for principled, sample-efficient methods. However, LLM training and inference costs are prohibitively high for most of the BBO research community, and new methods are often only evaluated on synthetic test functions and small-scale datasets that fail to capture the challenges of modern LLM optimization problems. This impedes the development of BBO methods and makes it difficult to assess their effectiveness on modern LLM tasks. We introduce BoLT, the first LLM-centric benchmark that democratizes LLM research for the BBO community. BoLT is released at https://github.com/chewwt/bolt. BoLT covers broad and well-motivated LLM optimization problems, involving multi-fidelity, multi-objective, heteroscedastic noise, and high-dimensional search spaces. Each problem in BoLT is grounded in real experimental data and made fully reproducible and accessible through lightweight surrogate models fitted to the results of thousands of real LLM experiments. We benchmark BoLT against an extensive range of BO and BBO methods, showing that selected BO methods consistently outperform others across tasks and highlighting gaps in existing BBO methods on LLM tasks, underscoring the need to modernize benchmarks for the BBO community.

大模型优化黑箱优化基准测试

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。