arXiv:2605.17256eess.SYcs.AI2026-05被引 2

为电力系统故障与攻击检测构建低延迟模型评测框架,揭示算法与实际部署间的性能差距。

Latency-Aware Deep Learning Benchmark for Real-Time Cyber-Physical Attack and Fault Classification in Inverter-Dominated Power Grids

论文配图:Latency-Aware Deep Learning Benchmark for Real-Time Cyber-Physical Attack and Fault Classification in Inverter-Dominated Power Grids
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 基于真实电磁暂态仿真数据,评估八类神经网络在实时流式信号下的表现
  • 所有模型实现亚周期响应(<15ms),但端到端延迟达50-90ms超三周期
  • 为保护级部署提供可复现基准,适合关注工业应用落地的从业者

本文提出一种面向电力系统异常检测的延迟感知评测框架,利用工业级电磁暂态仿真器生成的高保真时域信号,对从MLP到Transformer的八种神经网络架构进行系统评估。在代表逆变器主导电网中物理故障与网络攻击的流式数据集上,所有模型均实现亚周期响应(低于15毫秒)的实时分类。尽管分类决策可在单个周期内完成,但端到端推理延迟始终超过三个周期,范围为50至90毫秒。结果揭示了算法能力与保护级部署需求之间的关键差距,凸显进一步优化与硬件加速的必要性。研究建立了可复现的亚周期异常检测基准,为机器学习方法从原型向实际保护应用转化提供指导。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This work introduces a latency-aware benchmarking framework for evaluating deep learning models in power system anomaly detection using high-fidelity, time-domain signals generated from an industry-grade electromagnetic transient simulator. Eight neural network architectures, ranging from MLPs to Transformers, were systematically evaluated on streaming datasets representing both physical faults and cyber-attacks in inverter-dominated networks. All models successfully classified two representative multi-event sequences in real time with sub-cycle response times below 15 ms. However, although classification decisions occurred within one cycle, the end-to-end inference latency consistently exceeded three cycles, ranging from 50 to 90 ms. These results highlight a critical gap between algorithmic capability and protection-grade deployment, pointing to the need for further optimization and hardware acceleration. The findings establish a reproducible benchmark for sub-cycle anomaly detection and provide guidance for transitioning machine learning methods from research prototypes to real-world protection applications.

电力系统实时检测延迟优化深度学习

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。