构建印度婚姻诉讼判例数据集，揭示最高法院与高院裁决差异
IMLJD: A Computational Dataset for Indian Matrimonial Litigation Analysis
- 收集3613份婚姻纠纷判决，覆盖2000-2024年印度最高法院与卡纳塔克邦高院
- 最高法院撤销申请成功率57.6%，高于卡纳塔克邦高院的39.7%（差值19.6个百分点）
- 数据集开源，含结构化标签、元数据指标和知识图谱，适合法律与社会研究者
我们提出IMLJD，一个包含3,613份印度法院判决的开放数据集，涵盖2000至2024年间印度最高法院（1,474件）及卡纳塔克邦高等法院（2,139件）的婚姻纠纷案件，涉及《印度刑法典》第498A条、《保护妇女免受家庭暴力法》及《刑事诉讼法》第482条。数据集包含结构化结果标签、元数据衍生指标及知识图谱。研究发现，最高法院对撤销申请的批准率为57.6%，显著高于卡纳塔克邦高院的39.7%。在2018至2024年的匹配时段内，最高法院撤销率提升至59.3%，差距扩大至19.6个百分点，表明该差异具有时间稳定性。数据集、代码与知识图谱已公开发布于https://github.com/joyboseroy/imljd 和 https://huggingface.co/datasets/joyboseroy/imljd。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We present IMLJD, an open dataset of 3,613 Indian court judgments covering matrimonial disputes under IPC Section 498A, the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, and CrPC Section 482. The dataset covers the Supreme Court of India from 2000 to 2024 (1,474 cases) and the Karnataka High Court from 2018 to 2024 (2,139 cases), with structured outcome labels, metadata-derived indicators, and a knowledge graph. We find that 57.6% of quashing petitions succeed at the Supreme Court level compared to 39.7% at the Karnataka High Court level. On a matched 2018 to 2024 period, the SC quash rate is 59.3%, widening the differential to 19.6 percentage points and confirming the finding is robust to temporal adjustment. The dataset, code, and knowledge graph are released openly at https://github.com/joyboseroy/imljd and https://huggingface.co/datasets/joyboseroy/imljd.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。