arXiv:2605.20405eess.IVcs.AI2026-05

用少样本学习的采样策略提升医学图像分割中稀有类别的训练效果。

Disentangling Sampling from Training Budget in Class-Imbalanced CT Body Composition Segmentation

论文配图:Disentangling Sampling from Training Budget in Class-Imbalanced CT Body Composition Segmentation
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 引入少样本学习中的周期采样,实现类别平衡的训练批次构建。
  • 在低数据场景下,周期采样使Dice系数提升至0.787,优于随机和加权采样。
  • 无需修改模型,对小样本数据集有显著优势,适合医疗图像分割任务。

类别不平衡是医学图像分割中的根本挑战,常见类别常主导训练过程而忽视稀有类别。现有基于损失的方法通过重加权批次内像素损失缓解不平衡,而采样策略则控制哪些图像进入批次。但两者均未显式控制批次中出现的类别,导致稀有类别暴露程度仍不均衡。本文采用少样本学习中的周期采样策略,在全监督设置下促进类别平衡的批次构建。将周期采样从其传统的度量学习背景中解耦,并应用于CT中的体成分分割任务。在公开SAROS数据集的210例扫描中,对九种肌肉与脂肪组织进行比较,涵盖全数据与低数据训练场景,并额外对比相同训练迭代预算下的表现。全数据训练下,三种策略表现相当(周期采样平均Dice为0.882,随机与加权分别为0.878和0.878);低数据训练下,周期采样显著优于其他两种(0.787 vs. 0.758和0.762),该差异源于12倍的训练迭代差异。在匹配训练预算条件下,随机与加权采样过早过拟合,而周期采样持续提升约三倍迭代次数后才趋于平稳。研究指出训练迭代预算常被忽略,应建立迭代感知的评估协议。周期采样的残余优势表明类别平衡批次具有隐式正则化作用,提供一种低成本、模型无关的解决医学图像分割类别不平衡问题的新策略。代码已开源。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Class imbalance is a fundamental challenge in medical image segmentation, where frequent classes typically dominate training at the expense of rare classes. Loss-based approaches mitigate imbalance by reweighting the per-pixel loss within the batch, while sampling strategies control which images enter the batch. Yet neither explicitly controls which classes appear within the batch, leaving rare-class exposure only partially rebalanced. In this work, we adopt episodic sampling from few-shot learning to promote class-balanced batch construction in a fully supervised setting. We decouple episodic sampling from its conventional metric-learning context and evaluate it in body composition segmentation in CT. We compare episodic sampling against random and weighted sampling on nine muscle and adipose tissues, derived from 210 scans of the public SAROS dataset. Training is performed under full- and low-data regimes, with additional comparisons under matched training iteration budgets. Under full-data training, all three strategies performed comparably (mean Dice 0.882 for episodic, 0.878 for random and weighted). Under low-data training, episodic sampling outperformed random and weighted (0.787 vs. 0.758 and 0.762), driven by a 12-fold difference in training iterations. Under matched training budgets, random and weighted overfit earlier, while episodic improved for approximately three times more iterations before plateauing. Our findings identify the training iteration budget as under-recognized confound in sampling strategies, motivating iteration-aware evaluation protocols for small datasets. Furthermore, the residual advantage of episodic sampling is consistent with an implicit regularization effect of class-balanced batches, offering a low-cost, model-agnostic strategy for class-imbalanced medical image segmentation. Code is available at https://github.com/iasonsky/episodic-sampling.

医学图像类别不平衡采样策略分割

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。