用晶体学指数让AI理解断裂面几何，还能判断是否适用。

We study whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can leverage crystallographic plane indices (Miller indices) as a structured latent representation for reasoning about fracture geometry. We formulate Miller indices $z = (h,k,l)$ as a latent variable governing idealized planar fracture and evaluate two complementary capabilities: (i) latent inference, where the model maps visual observations to plane hypotheses under physically valid conditions, and (ii) latent applicability assessment, where the model determines whether such a representation is meaningful for a given fracture image. Through extensive experiments spanning synthetic data, controlled 2D--3D geometric pairs, and real-world fracture images across multiple material classes -- including ceramics, glass, metals, and concrete -- we show that MLLMs can reliably perform latent inference in idealized settings and, critically, can reject the latent representation when the underlying physics does not support it. As an exploratory extension, we further examine AI-generated fracture sequences and observe qualitatively plausible brittle-fracture progression behaviors, suggesting that multimodal generative models may encode partial implicit physical priors related to material failure dynamics. These results suggest that MLLMs can act as physics-aware reasoning systems conditioned on structured latent priors, provided that the domain of validity is explicitly modeled.