arXiv:2605.20544cs.ROcs.CV2026-05

提出机器人领域拒答新基准,测试视觉语言模型在真实场景下的判断能力。

The Yes-Man Syndrome: Benchmarking Abstention in Embodied Robotic Agents

论文配图:The Yes-Man Syndrome: Benchmarking Abstention in Embodied Robotic Agents
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 构建三阶段框架,基于图像生成可验证的拒答指令。
  • 测试发现顶级模型拒答率仅39%,暴露其决策盲区。
  • 适合研究具身智能、安全导航与模型可信性的学者。

视觉-语言模型(VLM)常作为具身智能体的高层规划器,将自然语言指令和视觉感知转化为动作计划。现有研究多关注文本模型的拒答行为,但缺乏对具身机器人环境中的感知基础和物理约束的考量。本文提出一种具身机器人场景下拒答行为的分类体系,并构建可扩展、可审计的RoboAbstention框架,基于五个机器人数据集中的图像生成拒答指令。该框架通过三阶段流程实现:(1) 结构化视觉定位,(2) 确定性约束推导,(3) 基于类别模板的可控指令生成,从而构建具有可验证拒答条件的多样化数据集。评估显示,所有前沿VLM均存在显著拒答缺陷,最佳模型Gemini 2.5 Flash仅对6,069条指令中的39.0%选择拒答,而具身规划器Gemini Robotics ER 1.6 Preview仅16.5%。通过防御性提示和上下文学习等干预手段,性能显著提升至93.6%(Gemini Robotics ER 1.6 Preview)和88.6%(GPT 5.4 Mini),但仍未完全解决该问题。代码已开源。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Vision-language models (VLMs) are used as high-level planners for embodied agents, translating natural language instructions and visual observations into action plans. While prior work has studied abstention in LLMs, existing benchmarks are largely text-only and do not capture the perceptual grounding and physical constraints inherent to embodied robotics environments. In such settings, abstention requires recognizing when instructions are ambiguous, physically infeasible, based on false premises, or otherwise unresolvable given the available sensory modalities and context. To address this gap, we introduce a taxonomy to categorize abstention in the context of embodied robotics and present RoboAbstention, a scalable and auditable framework for generating abstention instructions grounded in images gathered from five robotics datasets. RoboAbstention instantiates the taxonomy through a three-phase pipeline: (1) structured visual grounding, (2) deterministic constraint derivation, and (3) controlled instruction generation via category-specific templates. This enables the construction of a diverse dataset with verifiable abstention conditions. We evaluate several frontier VLMs and find that all models exhibit significant weaknesses in abstention, including those with advanced reasoning capabilities. The best-performing model, Gemini 2.5 Flash, abstains on only 39.0% of our 6,069 benchmark instructions, while the embodied planner Gemini Robotics ER 1.6 Preview abstains on just 16.5%. We further explore methods for improving abstention in VLM planners, such as defensive prompting and in-context learning, and find that these interventions substantially improve performance, reaching 93.6% abstention rate for Gemini Robotics ER 1.6 Preview and 88.6% for GPT 5.4 Mini, yet no approach fully solves the problem. We open-source RoboAbstention at https://purseclab.github.io/RoboAbstention/.

具身智能拒答评测视觉语言模型机器人安全

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。