arXiv:2605.21804eess.IVcs.CV2026-05被引 4

用AI嵌入直接识别加州番茄田,省去传统人工特征工程。

Mapping Tomato Cropping Systems in California Using AlphaEarth Geospatial Embeddings and Deep Learning Analysis

论文配图:Mapping Tomato Cropping Systems in California Using AlphaEarth Geospatial Embeddings and Deep Learning Analysis
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用AlphaEarth嵌入替代手工特征,直接输入模型进行分割
  • 测试集上像素准确率达99.19%,各项指标超98%
  • 适合农业遥感、精准种植等需要高精度地图的场景

田间尺度的作物地图有助于供应链预测和政策制定,但目前加州范围的作物识别仍依赖回顾性调查或基于人工设计光谱特征的遥感流程。这些方法虽准确,但需重复预处理,且跨年鲁棒性差。本研究评估了Google DeepMind的AlphaEarth地理空间嵌入是否可作为分析就绪的替代方案,用于识别加州加工番茄种植系统。使用LandIQ 2018作物多边形构建了一个包含4,742个番茄与4,742个非番茄地块的平衡参考数据集。对每个地块提取64通道的AlphaEarth嵌入切片并配准二值掩码,随后划分为空间独立的训练集(n=6,638)、验证集(n=1,422)和测试集(n=1,424)。在AWS SageMaker上训练了U-Net分割模型,采用复合掩码二元交叉熵与软Dice损失。为补充硬预测结果,推理阶段保留蒙特卡洛丢弃并重复100次以估计预测均值与方差。在独立测试集上,模型达到99.19%像素准确率、98.69%精确率、99.40%召回率、99.04%F1分数、98.11%交并比和99.02%切片准确率。不确定性图在地块边缘较高,内部较低。结果表明,AlphaEarth嵌入能保留与作物相关的时空结构,无需手动特征工程即可支持高精度、田块级番茄制图。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Field-scale crop maps support supply-chain forecasting and policy, yet statewide crop identification still often depends on retrospective surveys or remote-sensing workflows built around hand-engineered spectral features. Those pipelines can be accurate, but they require repeated preprocessing and often lose robustness across years. This study evaluated whether Google DeepMind's AlphaEarth geospatial embeddings can serve as an analysis-ready alternative for mapping processing tomato systems in California. LandIQ 2018 crop polygons were used to assemble a balanced reference dataset of 4,742 tomato and 4,742 non-tomato fields. For each polygon, 64-band AlphaEarth embedding chips were extracted and aligned with binary masks, then divided into spatially independent training (n = 6,638), validation (n = 1,422), and test (n = 1,424) sets. A U-Net segmentation model was trained on AWS SageMaker using a composite masked binary cross-entropy and soft Dice loss. To complement hard predictions, Monte Carlo dropout was retained at inference and repeated 100 times per chip to estimate predictive mean and variance. On the independent test set, the model achieved 99.19% pixel accuracy, 98.69% precision, 99.40% recall, 99.04% F1 score, 98.11% intersection over union, and 99.02% chip accuracy. Uncertainty maps were consistently highest near field edges and low within field interiors. The results show that AlphaEarth embeddings retain crop-relevant spatial and temporal structure and can support accurate, field-scale tomato mapping without manual feature engineering.

作物识别遥感深度学习地理嵌入

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。