用视觉语言模型提升神经网络故障检测效率与准确率
CAFD: Concept-Aware DNN Fault Detection using VLMs
- 融合输出信号、距离特征和概念失效比(CFR)进行故障检测
- 在受限预算下平均故障检出率提升18.3%
- 适合需要高效高精度故障检测的工业场景
深度神经网络(DNN)的故障检测近年来受到广泛关注。尽管已有混合方法结合多源信息并优于早期技术,但通常计算开销大,限制了实际应用。本文提出概念感知故障检测(CAFD),一种基于学习的方法,在保持高效的同时有效整合多源信息。CAFD利用精心选择的特征进行训练,包括来自DNN输出的模型信号、基于距离的特征,以及一种新提出的概念特征——概念失效比(CFR)。CFR借助视觉语言模型(VLMs)从图像中提取文本概念,并量化其存在与DNN故障的相关性。通过引入该特征,CAFD获得互补的语义信息,实现更优的故障检测。实验结果表明,CFR是有效的故障指示器。我们在三个主模型及数据集(包括ImageNet)上对CAFD进行了广泛评估,对比五种前沿基线方法。在多种约束选择预算下,CAFD始终优于所有基线,平均故障检出率(FDR)提升18.3%。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Fault detection for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has received increasing attention in recent years. While more advanced hybrid approaches have been proposed to combine multiple sources of information and outperform earlier techniques, they often incur substantial computational overhead, limiting scalability and practicality in real-world settings. In this paper, we introduce Concept-Aware Fault Detection (CAFD), a learning-based approach that achieves superior fault detection performance by effectively integrating multiple information sources while maintaining practical efficiency. Specifically, CAFD is trained using a carefully selected set of informative features, including model-based signals derived from the DNN's outputs, distance-based features, and a novel concept-based feature, called Concept Failure Ratio (CFR). CFR leverages Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to extract textual concepts from images and quantify the likelihood that their presence is associated with DNN failures. By incorporating this feature, CAFD benefits from complementary semantic information, enabling more effective fault detection. Our results demonstrate that CFR serves as an effective indicator for DNN fault detection. We conduct an extensive empirical evaluation of CAFD, comparing it against five state-of-the-art baselines across three subject DNN models and datasets, including ImageNet. Across a wide range of constrained selection budgets, CAFD consistently outperforms all baselines in Fault Detection Rate (FDR), achieving average FDR improvements of 18.3% across all investigated subjects and budget sizes.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。