用机器学习提升遥感水体检测与水质评估精度
Lake Detection and Water Quality Estimation in Sentinel-2 Data

- 对比三种机器学习模型,优化水体识别与监测
- 新色阶方案让水质指数更直观可读
- 适合环境监测、气候变化研究者使用
气候变化与人类活动加剧了内陆水体的稀缺与脆弱性,可靠、自动化的地表水体检测与监测方法日益重要。本文研究并比较了三种不同的机器学习架构在水体识别与监测中的表现,通过定量指标与真实案例评估其性能。同时,在代表性测试图像上与传统的NDWI阈值法进行直接对比,凸显数据驱动方法与指数法的差异。分析揭示了在准确率、鲁棒性和实用性方面表现最优的模型。除检测外,水质评估的关键挑战在于光谱水体指数的一致且可解释可视化。标准色彩映射常不适用或可能误导。为此,我们提出一组适配水质指数的有意义色阶,提升人机交互中的解读清晰度、可比性与决策支持能力。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
With climate change and increasing human pressure on natural landscapes, inland water resources are becoming progressively scarcer, more vulnerable, and more difficult to manage sustainably. Reliable and automated methods for detecting, monitoring, and assessing surface water bodies are therefore of growing scientific and practical importance. In this paper, we investigate and compare three distinct machine learning architectures for water body identification and monitoring. Their performance is evaluated through quantitative metrics and real-world examples. Furthermore, a direct comparison with classical NDWI thresholding is conducted on a representative test image to highlight differences between data-driven and index-based approaches. This analysis allows us to identify the best-performing model in terms of accuracy, robustness, and practical applicability. Beyond detection, a major challenge for meaningful water quality assessment lies in the consistent and interpretable visualization of spectral water indices. Standard color mapping techniques are often inadequate or potentially misleading for environmental applications. To address this gap, we propose a suite of meaningful color schemes adapted for water quality indices, facilitating clearer interpretation, comparison, and decision-making for human users.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。